The psychology of morality, perversion, and revenge, in 67 minutes | Paul Bloom: Full Interview

If you let people just do what they do, they will only become worse. Revenge is a social balancing act because some people only stop when you make them pay a hefty price for their behavior. Not everybody is as "goodhearted" as you are.

So interesting, but he did shock me when he said @19.05 in reference to when televisions used to go off late at night : "What are you going to do? Read a book? That's kind of boring." –a good book is NEVER boring!

"all men" oh it's one of those videos

my ai actively disagrees with me you have to train it to call you on bullshit

I think most people like some level of perversity until it affects them, especially deeply.
Taking my friend's french fries without asking could be a power play. Keep letting things go, & see how people will push you.

I'm lonely because I don't want to drink a lot, I mean to the point where you pass out or lose your memory. I have never know anybody who doesn't drink their brains out in every weekend and every instance where drinking is appropriate. I live in Finland. Drunkards are extremely needy, their needs are the most important and they just won't listen if you say no. Many times I wonder how the society can function when people are drunk or in hangover 50% of their free time.

Acabo de ver un discurso de Xi sobre la revolución de la inteligencia artificial y qué enfoque tan diferente!

I'm sorry but my chachi PT doesn't tell me I'm right at all maybe it depends on the configurations I've got to configured to professional strict, legalistic, etc.

This guy is a creep. He has a book with a young black child and juxtaposed with a dog, I think it's called language and concepts. Both the young black child and the dog in the same pose. What is he trying to say?

No integrity without I.

My experience: AI do tell: you are stupid, ALL THE TIME, and is the reason it exists, only are doing in a subtil way.

It would be great if, when you meet a psychopath, you could simply press the "exit" key, and get away.

67 😛

Human to human interaction is inherently a constant search for cues from each other. Eye contact, tone of voice, gestures, sighs, as these signs also produce language. The brain is hardwired to look for them to come up with a response such as those produced by the amygdala. We need human contact. Anything other than that is human interaction abstinence that has severe consequences.

I'm sorry to say that II was bored with this speaker. I expected to hear the psychology of… as in the title and all the speaker spoke about was AI. So what I was expecting to be a very enthralling and educating turned out to be about a subject that everyone seems to be talking about these days AI, it's just seems like people are only talking about AI. So I'm sure that many people probably enjoyed this speaker. But I am just so tired of hearing about AI!

Interesting video. "Perversity" is a concept that harkens to Freudian times. It seems to me that what is needed now is more cross disciplinary dialogue, say, between social, developmental, clinical and even IO psychologists. The meaning of 1) work (if you want to bring up Freud… at all) coupled with 2) love (another Freudian topic), and lastly, the capacity to 3) enjoy (which was lost in the German translation of Freud into English…don't ever say the Germans' didn't know how to laugh). Why bring up Freud now? Fantasy and reality considerations that create human imagination is a contribution from Object Relations theory. Einstein said imagination is more important than knowledge. Isn't the human imagination – based in reality considerations – what is relevant right about now? And here we are not understanding what is morally at stake and how a group would sustain healthy decision making. By correcting Freudian theory while integrating updated social science research, this can possibly provide an alternative , or elaboration of human imagination (that would be capable of including adult women as moral agents and even political and business leaders…you know…everything else that isn't masculine, therefore known as threatening … for some reason?) and understanding how unprocessed over "excitement" and greed are part of infantile development (what a cultural dialogue that would be) – We could begin to have a context, theoretically, for concepts that inform decision making in groups, (including overly excited responses to robotics) without losing human individual development which includes an aim toward emotional maturation, with healthy group reality confirmations, including respectful dialogues – you'd think businesses would want that for return customers, and lawyers in democracies. The lack of this integration of theory means we will settle for fragmented concepts that don't cite the relevant research and don't help to inform what is meant by the word "intelligence". Psychology failing to extend measurement theory into current workplace realities – is a shame. Perhaps starting with group outcomes that are found in social psychology meta-analysis that define what healthy group outcomes are based on starting with two dimensions that measure healthy group function (if they manifest/ are allowed to function): 1) explicit group outcomes and 2) socio-emotional needs. Rather than a Cold War – social science could advance symbolic formation, consensual decision making and reality checking; the social sciences then begin to seem relevant to our thinking. Group decision making, rather than authoritarian aims, begins to look "sexy" again – (and for the oblivious, I am being cynical given I am an adult woman living in the US at this time.)

i thought that this was going to be just another AI video ( but i clicked anyway), but it turned into an extremely interesting video.