Let’s Kill You a Billion Times to Make You Immortal

1. 

   @kurzgesagt

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   Go to https://ground.news/KiN to get 40% off unlimited access to Ground News so you can compare coverage and think critically about the news you read.

2. 

   @hallarw7907

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   That proves that Duaa
   Can make u the lucky version of you.
   And our fate isn't really definite it can be changed if Allah wills.
   And there are definitely creatures who can see us, but we can't see them. Because we are in a different dimension than them but they still co_ exist with us in the same " reality".
   And most importantly what we think is " reality " isn't really "reality".
   It's only what god wants us to see.
   Remember the 2 electrons that move together and act the same when we look at them.
   It might seem crazy but they are simply ordered to move this way.
   I think. والله أعلم

3. 

   @friendoffrancis

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   So wouldn't that mean the many worlds theory is not true because no one is immortal? If it was true, then even if you aren't immortal, someone else on this planet could be and they would be increasingly difficult to hide as time passes

4. 

   @xAserias

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   Probability doesn't really exist in physics.
   It usually just means we don't understand the reason or law well enough to predict it.

   The example with kicking an Elektron in the same way and position is unpredictable is wrong. Because we just don't have a good way to really affect, see and use it's position. Just like you can't predict a billiard ball. If the table is shaking and you don't know which way it goes in which Moment.

5. 

   @lional4898

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   I like how scientists avoid problems throwing randomness at it. Legit or not.
   Many worlds theory is the ultimate version of this

6. 

   @Wetius

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   When will this video be available on your Spanish channel?

7. 

   @Quantumni

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   9:26
   Why did that feel so, motivational and inspiring

8. 

   @Minemodman42

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   double the amount and give it to the next person

9. 

   @juanromanguererecuenca2405

   February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

   Out here teaching sience better then our sience teachers😭

10. 

    @adam......2635

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    so i can suvive if mydas turns the world to gold

11. 

    @ReidymakDA

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    What if the voices we hear to do bad things or something out of the ordinary are the echoes of our other selves

12. 

    @yaboijdizzle227

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    I am either fully sold on Quantum immortality or I have been getting insanely lucky since less than 1 year old with many near death experiences. Some in particular beating the probable odds of survival

13. 

    @momoftriof7090

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    A dream i saw a dream a dream that wouldn’t end over and over again i repeated and corrected every mistake but before i new it i lost count i died over 100 Million Times

14. 

    @JonathanJollimore-h8v

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    It’s unfortunate. I have to resort to this kind of crap. But like I said, their deaths aren’t permanent. Oh eventually be a point where you know I won’t have to do that.

15. 

    @khalilamay7492

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    thanks, im gonna question reality for the 806th time again

16. 

    @josephasbury4492

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    If more than one outcome was possible due to the nature of particle wave forms, very few outcomes would ensure that a 1:1 match of our conciousness would even survive a diverging timeline. Variability itself would affect not just the world around us, but also ourselves. The actionable magnitude of the impulses created by the neurons within our brain would be susceptible to the same variation. This means that all the mental processes responsible for the thoughts we conciously and subconciously perceive are vulnerable to change. The train of thought we're on and background proccesses involved will likely be different everything from a few seconds to a few minutes before whatever catastrophic event occurs that determines our fate.

    There is a very, very remote chance that there won't be enough variation in stimulus to break our then chain-of-thought; the mind, however, that experiences death will suffer it regardless. The very idea that we could even perceive that a variable-outcome event has occurred in real-life and somehow monitor the diverging concious paths afterwards is pure fantasy. Watching it go down via a simulation could be interesting, though.

17. 

    @hedgeverse474

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    Anjali, I know you're reading this, it is true. It is all true.

18. 

    @ICrawledOutFromTheAbyss

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    rain world?

19. 

    @user-st4ew3cz6z

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    I know my question might seem underwhelming compared to other but, but i’d genuinely like to know if it absolutely has to be a nuke or could any other lethal weapon could be triggered the same way

20. 

    @gbmp419

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    Explains how my stupid ahh still here

21. 

    @James-xe9kq

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    This is a rick and morty reference lol

22. 

    @IlikeRepo

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    But how is that a definitively conclusive test? You could still just get really lucky, and survive 100 times in a row. It might be a really small chance but why would that grant you immortality, or prove anything at all?

23. 

    @tair7

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    This is probably the most nonsensical & meaningless video I've seen on this channel

24. 

    @NahasNephilim

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    I mean technically the probability wave thing works to describe everything
    big stuff just has a very well defined boundary between 0% and 100% of being itself
    small stuff doesn't

25. 

    @lukeyfart

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    rick and morty timelines ahh

26. 

    @paneason4507

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    I agree with the linguists

27. 

    @paneason4507

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    Then why does people die in wars the bullet or shell will just teleport back and visversa

28. 

    @Ozeka602

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    I just opened YouTube and kurzgesagt already wants to kill me

29. 

    @goober7601

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    what about like old age

30. 

    @AarushSingam

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    *Looks at title*
    Yup, seems like an interesting video! Let me just MURDER myself!
    *Watches video*
    …

31. 

    @JabreeGarrison

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    If an Electron is Everywhere at once Untill observed Can't you just run the experiment 1000 Times Then Take The PROBABILITY of where it gets stationary The most Thus giving us a "Point" to make Valid predictions at where the electron is most of the time 🤔

32. 

    @theivanbob

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    Unless you die, you won't die 👍

33. 

    @Eggsyest

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    I feel like kurzgesagt is just Zack d films but for actually learning things and slightly less deranged

34. 

    @witchofthelandandsea4143

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    This exponentially helps my fear of death.

35. 

    @Aespa_0uts0ld

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    can somebody do the sacrifice we want to know

36. 

    @lukefranklin5

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    Well wouldn’t there eventually be a time where there’s no possible universe where you survive and at that point you’d die?

37. 

    @SkylerBaisch

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    🤔… it would be interesting to find out if through the randomness it still followed the rule of normal distribution or the "bell curve looking at the double split experiment it has a observable pattern that from a laments perspective makes it look like a normal distribution. Yes you get 80% in the kitchen and 20% in the livingroom but maybe that's only because you looked in the living room and not the yard on the other side of the kitchen. If you are firing electrons they can go through both slits at once therfore they are creating 'double' the potential points of… well "probability"! So your experiment may have just been accounting for half.

38. 

    @Bamibein

    February 1, 2026 at 6:41 am

    What track
    Is uses in the background

Comments are closed.