Evolution: Fact or Theory? (both [mostly fact])

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-eHvyV0e0Q

You can’t argue with this I have watched over hundred debates , why do they lose every time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-eHvyV0e0Q ?

I know this si an old video, but i just came across it, so bare with me. First of all, good vide, you have a nice down to earth angle to all this. One thing though. You use terms like "micro" and "macro" evolution when infact there is no such thing.

"macro" evolution is just "micro" evolution on a larger scale.

I can talk evolution is fantasy in 2 mins. First, the mainstream science is pseudo science since it cant explain why the moon is static on it axis. That alone debunk Newton's assumed law of motion. Second, Since dinosaurus and giants got wipe out from the face of the earth, where is their evolution? Thirdly, we are about to be instinct again, just look up. What do you think they (NASA) been hiding about? Thats the one which wipe out the giants and dinosaurus and the unbelievers and egoistic ignorant fools who think they exist by self manifestation. Evolution belongs to the joke book section as well as the bible

Nope u still wrong… use the damn dictionary:
http://m.dictionary.com/definition/theory?linkid=ibc5yn&srcpage=home&site=dictwap

Stop being so biased. Look at both sides and not just evolution as "the answer" to all life form and humanity. Since youre an "athiest", i can understand u want an answer to life in its entirety instead of being clueless and feeling dumb… but u dont need to jump rite into evolution cuz it contradicts the Bible.
Sumthing cant come from nothing. Basic logic. And who the fuck r u to say there is zero evidence against these evolutionary theories? LOL dude a lot of it has been disproved and ive studied both sides. Carbon dating? Not accurate and is not proven to be effective… i cud go on and on. Stop being narrow minded.
And just sumthing to think about… how cud we hav millions of galaxies, endless space, amazing creatures, human anatomy, this amazing complicated world and everything in it with animals always reproducing the same KIND of species… ALWAYS. Dog fucking horse and u got a dorse? No. If there wasnt a God? Possibly yes. We didnt evolve thats ridiculous. No evidence and a lot of fosils are often proven to not b what they are claimed. If there wasnt a God, i cud see evolution being possible but like i sed, the whole universe with all its galaxies and black holes and tons of shit we still dont kno a speck about and the amazing structure of humans and varieties of animals? No fucking way we "evolved". A God wud create an amazing place as this. Not sum "big bang" lol get real dude. U are pretentious. Yeh go use the dictionary, cuz a lot of what u say isnt what it really means.
And stop rolling your eyes, u look gay, seriously.
I aint hatin, just givin my perspective on all the perspectives i look at.
U ask for our comments and im givin mine.
U can believe what u want religious or not but dont say evolution is a fact or at least talk like its a fact without a reasonable doubt. U aint no scientist..
Just cuz u read what they say doesnt mean shit. They have pride and just like cops, they dont want to feel stupid if they fuckup or look incompetent.
Peace.love.empathy.

you need to watch Kent Hovind seminars. An see how evolution fails miserably.

Yeah probably, I also agree with most of your points still pointing out the flaws with my plan. I just wanted to promote intellectual thought rather then the typical Science vs Religion arguement that never gets anywhere. Science always says that you need proof of religion, and religion says that maybe its up to science to look for proof, which is complete crap. Because if you're the party arguing something radically far from evidence, you're the group who has to prove it tangibly.

I see what you are saying – you are postulating a whole new religion basically – one that believed in a God, but just as a super powerful being who lent a helping hand to the universe and life but did not really interact with the universe or care about whether we mixed cotton and linen or worked on a particular day under pain of death. I could live with that notion 🙂

I did not initiate an argument – sorry if it seemed that way.

I just think that religion and science are diametrically opposed that's all – for centuries religion has tried to deny or supress scientific discoveries. If religion accepted science it would have to throw out most of it's dogma – which is at the core of belief. For example Christianity would collapse if people accepted that Adam & Eve did not exist, therefore no Fall, therefore no need for redemption or to accept Jesus.

Let me clarify my statement: What if religion claimed that god was the one who created all the principles that allow carbon based life forms to evolve and be created, what if god's way of creating things is what we call science, evolution, and the like.
What if the gentle nudge in the universe that created the perfect situation to create the first single celled organism on the one life sustaining planet for thousands of light years around was god? wouldn't that make more sense then religon today

Well saying that a single cell was created from "nothing" shows some kind of misunderstanding.

Besides religion and science can never really work together in any meaningful way. Science relies on obersvation, falsification, reality and empiricism. Religion relies on supernatural claims that suspend the natural order – nothing that can be measured.

I believe there is a gap in your understanding of what evolution is. All breeds or dogs (Canis Lupus Familiaris) are related to domesticated wolves (Canis Lupus) – clearly we can see lots of different breeds of dogs. If you can accept that as a FACT then evolution is a FACT – otherwise you have to explain how we managed to create so many breeds of dog through artificial selection,

Just one small point – there is no distinction between "micro" and "macro" evolution. Its all evolution except that so-called "macro" evolution takes place over longer time scales.

Creationists differentiated the terms because there was so much evidence that they could no longer claim that small changes in the genome do not happen – but instead focus on the unobservable speciation events that they claim we have never observed. Alas they were wrong there as well but won't ever admit it.

But it doesn't…whoa man.

Awesome video. I believe u hit the nail on the head on this 1 😀

that's a common, terrible argument. first of all, no one has ever said "we come from monkeys" what is said is that all primate share a common apelike ancestor. Secondly, that's like saying "if bread comes from grains, why are there still grains?!!" it doesn't make any sense

Well this is what I was told through both my high school biology teacher and a documentary on early creatures.
Life itself came when a meteor crashed into our planet, bringing bacteria and causing the earth to drift far enough from the sun to be suitable for life ( I think ).
These bacteria had thousands of years to sit and eventually one had a small mutation, which gave the bacteria some kind of advantage, then after trillions of small mutations spanning millions of years, variety came.

evolution is not abiogenesis.

Me too! Great comment.

3 Sweet. Clear, concise, easy to understand and patient explanation. Next time I hear someone say evolution is just a theory, I'll send them this link and let you explain.

No but the big hole in the evolution theory is that fact that no one knows how it began!