How the British Monarchy Has Survived For So Long

Nepotism at its very best. They managed to convince an entire nation to forever support the most expensive welfare recipients and consider it a privilege and an honor while the nation struggles to survive in a middling class environment. How many billions have they given them already ?

One word answer: propaganda.
Longer answer: propaganda of the kind North Korea could only dream of.

Lizard food has helped.

QE II was very beautiful when she was young and she married that snotty conceited prince Philip

i think good still have a king.

Charles 2 was one of the most immoral public figures ever.

Victoria may be called the famine queen in Ireland. Was there not also a famine Pope?

1:22 The Brewers are the family of my public school band teacher Mr. Brewer.

Such a fantastic teacher!

We love our royals long kive the King! God bless prince William and Kate, princess Anne, all the working royals!! not so fan of liar, scheming call girl and the dumb prince todger Harry❤❤❤

the UK monarch is their national identity. they are known world wide because of their kings and queens.

That was not William of Orange in the portrait omg i watched too much British Momarch History already that I know how monarchs look like

Your image of William III is all wrong…that's either William I or II.

I like the monarchy since they ensure the unity of the country, and the heir is already trained in early age. However, what I don't like about the monarchy is the budget allocation where it includes other members of the royal family and all of them are exempted from taxes. If I could create/reform a monarchy, budget allocation would be limited to the Monarch, the spouse, and the heir (where they are also forbidden to exercise profession), and they are also be subject to taxation. The palace should be publicly owned, and the budget would not extend to the Monarch's other properties.

2:22 That's William 2 not William 3, easy mistake if you're doing a quick google search and get the wrong picture, but it's pretty funny knowing how different they are and are separated by about 600 years. That William is from proper medieval England, literally the son of William the Conqueror.

Prince Charles wasn’t king because when a man married a Queen or Princess he got the male equivalent of her titles, so he would have had the same amount of power as her and he used to be apart of a foreign monarchy. Queen Mary I had been happy to give power to her husband King Philip II of Spain, and Queen Elizabeth I didn’t get married, and Mary II and her husband had a joint ruling, so Queen Elizabeth II chose to name him as a Prince of the UK the was with Queen Victoria.

My family history can go back to as far as 1066, but not sure what went on before that. I wish I knew about the Ogle family line since it was a noble family.

What do the Royals address each other as? Did Prince William address Queen Elizabeth as "Queen Grandma"? Does Prince George address King Charles as "King Grandpa"?

I'm Canadian, and I see the royals as nothing more than the British Kardashians. I don't think anyone 30 and under here gives a single shit about them, but our boomer and gen x moms sure tend to like them. I find it very strange to have the Queen's (soon to be the King's?) head on our coins and our $20 bill, however, the royal family constitutionally and economically ties us to the Commonwealth. I love that we are so far apart from Australia, New Zealand, and the UK, yet we still share a sort of shared consciousness. Of course, we are also allowed to remain very critical of the system without the threat of heads rolling. They're a big part of Canadian identity, despite being mostly an afterthought for everyone here. It's weird.

I wish I owned an empire that would rule for centuries and have my enemies envy and despise my legacy of global domination

Jesus is indeed Lucifer the Morning Star, which is why Isaiah 14:12 lists Lucifer as the Morning Star and then Jesus calls himself the Morning Star in Rev 22:16. The reason Christians fail to see the obvious is because they are brainwashed by their churches into reading the Bible BACKWARDS and reading the New Testament BEFORE the Old Testament. We read books from FRONT TO BACK for a reason, and that is because you can't possibly understand the end of a book that you don't understand the beginning of. And it is not even possible to fully understand a book from reading the LAST QUARTER of it. With that being said…—-> Adam and Eve were NOT first, and the 2 stories of Creation in Genesis are NOT about the same Creation as the Christian church teaches. GOD makes people on the 6th day of Creation in Genesis 1:26. Then in Genesis chapter 2 God rests, God sanctifies the 7th day, and then the LORD God of Israel creates Adam and Eve on the 7th day of Creation. To work on the 7th day that God has blessed and sanctified is BLASPHEMY, which is what makes the LORD God SATAN the LORD of this world. That also makes clear that Adam and Eve were NOT FIRST, they were made second. Doesn't the 6th day of Creation come BEFORE the 7th day of Creation?—-> The family lineage that begins with Adam and ends with Jesus is the family lineage made by SATAN the LORD God, not God. That's why Isaiah 14:12 lists Lucifer as the Morning Star, and then Jesus calls himself the Morning Star in Rev 22:16. Jesus was Lucifer in the flesh, not God in the flesh. Jesus is Lucifer the Morning Star! Go to my channel for more details…

That NEW WORLD Order that Alex Jones and other GOP Christians pretend to fight is really the goal of Christianity otherwise known as the NEW EARTH (Isaiah 65:17, Isaiah 66:22, 2 Peter 3:13, Rev 21:1) to be ruled by the New Jerusalem. The New Earth is where the nations are destroyed and massed together for a world government that will be on the shoulders of Jesus. Well, isn't the New World Order a world government as well? And gee, New Earth even sounds exactly like New World, doesn't it? That is not a coincidence, the New Earth is indeed the New World Order. It's all right there in your NEW WORLD Translation Bible if you actually bothered to read it…

There are European monarchies in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Monaco, Spain and Liechtenstein. Some of these have lasted as long as the British Monarchy, yet nobody posts about how it's unbelievable that these countries still haven't become republics. Well, maybe Spain, but that's because of stupidly living large by certain royals and for fuzzy nostalgia for the Second Republic.