Bill Nye: The Search for Life Begins with Water | Big Think

Bill, stop lying, it's going to catch up with you and you will be sorry you told lies. The search for life also begins with who created water, etc, and why. Can you give that answer, Bill? Can you explain with 100% provable accuracy, not a wild guess, the first origins, cause and purpose of space, time, information, matter, energy, organization, change, and the like, and what happened before those things were created? Bet you can't! And don't try to pass off dumb ideas like nothing is the origin of something, like the universe, because only a completely insane person would even think that you can get anything from something that never existed before. Such wild ideas of something from nothing are totally preposterous and there is no evidence of it.

Dinosaurs to birds:
It's so easy to say that dinosaurs led to birds, but the problem with that is nobody has ever found the missing links that prove the evolution from dinosaurs to birds, there are no in-between creatures that look like a mixture of the two through the so called stages of change, all we ever see is that dinosaurs always look like dinosaurs and birds always look like birds, but hey, since when would an evolutionist atheist want to be exposed for the outright lies they tell? If dinosaurs turned into birds, they would be bad dinosaurs before they could become good birds that worked properly and so they just could not survive, and information does not improve or ad during change, information gets lost and degraded during change. Doesn't anyone understand that or understand thermodynamics?
Evolutionists are horrible liars, yet so many fools follow their foolishness like it was real truth. Goes to show you how brain dead and dumb sheeple truly are. Shame on you, Bill, and your kind, for trying to pass off lies as truth and working to trick the world into swallowing those lies. Satan is the father of lies, and you are doing his will, and you will reap what you sow in the end.

Sure, water is absolutely necessary for life as we know it. Doesn't change the fact that most planets with water, even Mars, to the degree it has water, are so inhospitable and SOO far away (years to hundreds or thousands of years at max speed), would be so impractical to reach (trillions in cost for a small group to go) that it would NEVER be more cost effective to travel there than to fix our planet. Even if we killed all life on Earth with our blunders, at least Earth has the right conditions to re-establish life. No planet we have found would support our breathing needs or needs with regard to temperature (namely vast liquid water). Even if we found such a planet the soil would be completely barren – no organics to fertilize soil ( no carbons in the soil to build upon), most likely no nitrogen for plants, high salt ratios, etc; meaning we would have to bring our own topsoil at least to this new planet. That's IF it has an appropriate ozone, cloud cover, the UV protective and pressurizing combination of vapors and chemistry needed to contain a potential atmosphere, AND isn't too rich in nitrogen, sulfur, chlorine, or a host of over elements that become toxic at just above the concentrations found on Earth. Leaving Earth is not a solution that is worth pursuing. It would be easier to colonize the oceans than Mars, and far cheaper. THAT'S why looking for water in Space is dumb, and wastes millions of dollars. Until we figure out how to build vessels which can reach Mars with extreme ease and cost effectiveness, and until every last inch of Earth is spent or dying, going elsewhere wouldn't be an option considered in any decision making framework that isn't subsidized.

This might sound silly but this guy looks like Abraham Lincoln. What do you think ?

I have yet to find a reason as to why scientist are so obsessed with water. wouldn't liquid make more sense ?

see the thing with science is that we don't have all the answers there is no shame in that. there is shame in pretending we have answers when we don't. that is the beauty of science. science is a tool that is ever changing, and mechanism that helps us search for truth with in this vast universe that we have only begun to understand.

 You know I was wondering, We may rely on water but we adapted to need water. why cant a organism rely on something else like maybe dirt (just an example obviously even if it's a bad one) but why do we think all organisms have to rely on water?

mother of science

well think of a single celled orgisinam it might not need water to survive, lets say ammonia i know its toxic to us but you gotta think not all species need water their might be an ailen who needs a bleachy substance so in a way it depends on what the things body is suited to drink or eat

Is it possible to identify other likely requirements on planets hundreds of light years away with these same telescopes? Magnetic field and ozone shielding? O2 rich atmosphere? Historical atmospheres like the Co2 composition of our Ordovician Period to get the primitive plants started?

How many planets are there within a few hundred light years? I'd like the believe we could find something out there, but it just seems untenable.

and you cant have water with out atmosphere except maybe in europus case.

hes old now

Water is only one of the requirements for life. Evolutionists tend to believe that if there is water, then there could be life. If anyone believes all we need is water, they are welcome to live in the middle of the ocean. Also, if we do not possess the means of travelling to or communicating with other planets, then it is a waste of time, money, work, and resources to look for water anywhere else.

Bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill bill nye the science guy! Looooved tv as a kid. Weird shows.