menu Home chevron_right
PHILOSOPHY

Why This Oxford Mathematician is Confident God Exists | John Lennox

Alex O'Connor | September 10, 2025



Get all sides of every story and be better informed at https://ground.news/AlexOC – subscribe for 40% off unlimited access.

For early, ad-free access to videos, and to support the channel, subscribe to my Substack: https://www.alexoconnor.com

To donate to my PayPal (thank you): http://www.paypal.me/cosmicskeptic

– VIDEO NOTES

This episode was shot in the Oxford Union’s Goodman library. The Union is currently fundraising for restoration. Info: https://bastion.oxford-union.org/homepage Donate: https://bastion.oxford-union.org/fundraising/donation/11

The Oxford Union on YouTube: ‪@OxfordUnion

John Lennox is a Northern Irish mathematician, bioethicist, and Christian apologist originally from Northern Ireland. He has written many books on religion, ethics, the relationship between science and God, and has had public debates with atheists including Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens.

– TIMESTAMPS

0:00 – Are Science and Religion in Conflict?
18:32 – Does Evolution Challenge Religion?
28:47 – DNA, Language, and the Logos
39:26 – God of the Gaps?
49:03 – Does Evolution Undermine the Specialness of Humans?
59:35 – Does Belief Come From Argument?
01:08:48 – Why is Intellectualism Tied with Atheism?
01:15:22 – The New Atheist Critique of Religion
01:24:22 – Why Discussion is Better Than Debate

– CONNECT

My Website: https://www.alexoconnor.com

SOCIAL LINKS:

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/cosmicskeptic
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/cosmicskeptic
Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/cosmicskeptic
TikTok: @CosmicSkeptic

The Within Reason Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/within-reason/id1458675168

– CONTACT

Business email: contact@alexoconnor.com

——————————————

Written by Alex O'Connor

Comments

This post currently has 23 comments.

  1. @jay-ti7kd

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    The fact that it is this hard to know that there is god shows there's non. And if a god punishes us for our lack of knowledge or conviction about his extence but not for blatant disobedience, then fk him! He deserves no worship

  2. @stevebuczynski2756

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    Edgy athiests are just as annoying as self righteous/judgmental Christians. Neither are good representations are their supposed beliefs. Both filled with hate, insults, and close minded presumptions. These two men certainly good examples of how mature and rational adults ought to behave with one another.

  3. @onomato-l9g

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    I think you should do Roger Penrose. He's an atheist (I believe, or at least an agnostic) and his ideas are very interesting. He outright made the claim the only proof of God science would accept would be an observable signature in the universe, for example encoding of text in the background radiation. At the same time he agrees on the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics, as well as the antrophic principle, he also makes good points about how the theory of evolution doesn't explain away why we are bizarrely (and illogically) very tuned to understand our universe from a mathematical and physical perspective, even though there is almost no evolutionary benefit to it (and If there are any, they are so marginal they are irrelevant). .To top it off he's not a materialist, but instead is exploring the possibility that the universe is cyclic and infinite. He's a fascinating mind.

  4. @kanesadler114

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    This has helped me really understand that debating isn’t worth it. Rather, having discussions, allow to hear the other person and see why they believe what they believe. I’ll have to keep that in my pocket for future reference.

  5. @johanbadenhorst908

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    All the fundamentalist, literalists are applauding you giving their apostle a kind hearing. But, he needs to be challenged, Alex. There are numerous presumptions on which he rides. Most generally, what bothers me is that he rides on his claim to fame as an Oxford Professor which means he must know (according to popular view—which is an argument to authority and invalid.) He also rides in on being a mathematician to which the deconsctructed discourse is a claim to cleverness. He can’t be dumb. And then he often rides in on the preface: “As a scientist,” which again, is a rhetorical devise to claim trustworthiness, reliability. The fact is that his treatment of the Bible is very naive indeed: The Bible says it and that, pretty much, settles it. He needs to come clean and say: I am not saying this as an Oxford professor, or scientist. I am merely parroting orthodox, doctrinal Christian belief, which, you should agree, is my right. He uses his academic fame as his trojan horse. His views are very tethered to fideistic doctrine. He is simply an apologist.

  6. @ChernyDekimpe

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    The first time i see connor holds in 😉
    I respect your way , because jhon may be a example for you , and this time you want to listen more than you ask .
    But if i was you i would research everything possible lennox knows , and get the fight with him xp if you fight him , we all be much closer to the truth xp

    Peace bro stay yourself , life has time , dont do it tomorrow

  7. @davegaskell7680

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    Whilst a polite, respectful conversation is good, it's a shame that there wasn't more challenge. John Lennox is a master of avoiding direct questions and it's frustrating that he's able to get away with it. Take the very first question for example. Yes, there was a challenge about the findings of science undermining religion but he deflected by talking about China. The point is, does he believe that miracles are possible? If he does then that directly contradicts science. That's the fundamental conflict between religion and science.

  8. @1134_BAVANESH

    September 10, 2025 at 11:04 am

    A Genuine question;even if one believes he has seen enough evidence for god;how is it that he knows it to be the God HE BELIEVES IN;the "right" one per se.For example how does a christian know it is the Christian God and not Kutkh or Atum or Mbombo or Tangaroa or The Vedic Purusha ? Many of whose stories might I add, contradict Christian Theory of creation

Comments are closed.




This area can contain widgets, menus, shortcodes and custom content. You can manage it from the Customizer, in the Second layer section.

 

 

 

  • play_circle_filled

    92.9 : The Torch

  • play_circle_filled

    AGGRO
    'Til Deaf Do Us Part...

  • play_circle_filled

    SLACK!
    The Music That Made Gen-X

  • play_circle_filled

    KUDZU
    The Northwoods' Alt-Country & Americana

  • play_circle_filled

    BOOZHOO
    Indigenous Radio

  • play_circle_filled

    THE FLOW
    The Northwoods' Hip Hop and R&B

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play