menu Home chevron_right
NEWS & CULTURE

Why US elections only give you two choices

Vox | October 11, 2024



We don’t like the two-party system. So why do we have it?

Help keep Vox free for everybody: http://www.vox.com/give-now

America’s two-party system is widely hated. Very few Americans think the two major parties do an adequate job representing us, and most say more parties are needed. But when it comes time to vote, very few of us actually vote for third-party candidates. Often, this is explained as either a failure of will (we’d have third parties if more people would just vote for them), or a conspiracy (the political and media establishments suppress third-party candidates and ideas).

And it’s not that those things aren’t true. But there’s a much simpler explanation, and it’s the very basic rule governing almost every single one of our elections: Only one person can win. If you’re American, that probably sounds utterly reasonable: what the hell other kinds of elections even are there? But the answer is: lots. Winner-take-all elections (also called plurality voting, or “first past the post”) are actually a practice that most advanced democracies left behind long ago — and they’re what keep us from having more political options.

Even if you’re not sold on the need for more parties in the US, though, scratch the surface of “only one person can win” a little and you start to see how it actually produces perverse results within the two-party system as well. It’s a big part of why the political parties have moved farther apart from each other, and it leaves about half of the country without any political representation at all. Watch the video above to see how.

Subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications (🔔) so you don’t miss any videos: http://goo.gl/0bsAjO

00:00 Two choices
1:05 Winner take all elections
3:05 Proportional representation
6:14 How to change things

This video was inspired in part by this 2017 video by Liz Scheltens, Mallory Brangan, and Matt Yglesias, which I really recommend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd-9op64t2M

Sources and further reading:

The political journal Democracy devoted an entire issue to the idea of proportional representation in the US, with essays by several of the people who have thought the most about it: https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/70/for-a-better-democracy-proportional-representation/

The advocacy group Protect Democracy put together a really helpful primer on the different kinds of proportional representation and the philosophy behind it in general: https://protectdemocracy.org/work/proportional-representation-explained/

Protect Democracy also authored this report about how to actually change the law that prevents proportional representation in the US Congress: https://protectdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Towards-Proportional-Representation-_-March-2023-.pdf

The organization FairVote mapped out what multi-member congressional districts would look like throughout the US: https://fairvote.org/sample-fair-representation-act-maps/

RadioLab did an episode explaining single transferable voting, Ireland’s electoral system, that I found really fun and helpful: https://radiolab.org/podcast/tweak-vote/transcript

Here’s the 2023 poll showing that two-thirds of Americans want a viable third party: https://news.gallup.com/poll/512135/support-third-political-party.aspx

The UK’s Electoral Reform Society has a helpful resource on which countries use which kinds of electoral system: https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/which-european-countries-use-proportional-representation/

The Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center has info on where in the US ranked choice voting is already being used: https://www.rcvresources.org/where-is-rcv-used

The federal law mandating single-member districts for congressional elections is the 1967 Uniform Congressional District Act. The language is here in Section 2c: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title2/pdf/USCODE-2011-title2-chap1-sec2c.pdf

Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO

Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what’s really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.

Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H

Written by Vox

Comments

This post currently has 34 comments.

  1. @delaroche3703

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    I'm from New Zealand – in 1993, we had a referendum to change our electoral system from First Past the Post (FPP) to Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) – so now, we vote for whoever we want (of course, we have 2 main parties that get most of the votes), and generally, one large party will win and have to create a coalition with 1-2 smaller parties that got lots of votes too. Votes also correlate to seats in parliament, so we have more varied discussions. I feel like our voices are actually heard.

  2. @GoogleAccount-wy1ub

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    I'm not American, but a 3rd party should be banned. It's been seen in historic American elections that it splits the Democrat/Republican vote, causing the unfavored party to win because of the other party's split vote.

    It's not a democratic way to vote

  3. @jefflebowski3784

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    Your premise is that other democratic forms of government are inherently better, yet you don’t provide any evidence or even convincing arguments as to why we should consider your premise correct.
    For example, you argue that with the two party system in order to pass a law it is almost always necessary to gain support from the opposition party (correct), however you don’t point out that with proportional representation this would still be necessary though this takes the form of needing to build a coalition across parties on the specific issue at hand. These two situations are similar though with differences, but you fail to provide a convincing argument to support your position that for this specific example a proportional system is better.

  4. @ZiontheMagnificent

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    Great video! Just a couple questions. Would a new system work in the US in particular? It is, after all, a very large country and the top countries by population and size don't seem like the best examples. And is there another way to fix the 2 party problem? Is there a completely outside of the box solution? Please comment because I'm sure there are some great ideas floating around.

  5. @jmurphy6767

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    What would help Congress and thus the Electoral College be more representative is to make districts smaller. It would make gerrymandering much harder, if not impossible. Imagine being able to personally know and have access to your rep! Running for office would be more affordable, encouraging more people to get involved. There would be some challenges, such as the physical size of Capitol Hill, but that’s solvable.
    The number of reps used to adjust with population but was fixed in 1920 by Congress. It can be changed with a Congressional act, no Amendment needed. The biggest barrier is that the party in power isn’t ever likely to change the rules (as the Republicans decided to fix the rules 100 years ago. They also put off reapportionment from the 1920 Census, which first showed a majority urban population, jeopardizing the Republicans’ majority)

  6. @jmurphy6767

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    I’m tired of people whining about this. Rarely in history have Americans liked the two choices we have. It’s often the lesser of two evils. Get over it and make your decision.

  7. @juanvilas5341

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    Let me give you an outsider prospective then there is a big problem with both parties and the voting system in general.
    In what brain can you call a democracy something whose popular vote means nothing, as long as the other non-popular candidate wins the states with the most points? Moreover, when the two political parties are directly bought by business magnates, therefore, the interests of the population, if not third, are placed fourth or fifth in the level of importance.
    "But you can vote!" In Venezuela people could vote, does that make it a democracy? There is a reason why in the democratic indexes the United States is not among the most democratic countries and is called a "flawed democracy".

  8. @wahid8997

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    America pretends to be the poster boy of democracy where its own people each year has to chose the lesser evil between 2 leaders. In reality America is just a Crony capitalistic state.

  9. @rickyspanish3821

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    This is why I think the US is falling apart not because of just one side it's because both sides are arguing so much they're not seeing the destruction they are doing to this great country that was once THE GREATEST*

  10. @SmellFeetSometimes

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    In Australia we also have ranked voting.

    It's great because I can vote for my favourite party first without worry that my least favourite party will win due to my actions. I don't have to choose one over the other, I can assign how much I like each party.

  11. @HdhsRachs

    October 11, 2024 at 3:47 am

    The entire reason why there aren’t multi member districts is because of racism. Of course a white person is going to advocate for it because they’ll just group a minority group in theirs to boost votes

Leave a Reply





This area can contain widgets, menus, shortcodes and custom content. You can manage it from the Customizer, in the Second layer section.

 

 

 

Newsletter

  • play_circle_filled

    92.9 : The Torch

  • cover play_circle_filled

    01. Cyborgphunk
    Grover Crime, J PierceR

    file_download
  • cover play_circle_filled

    02. Glitch city
    R. Galvanize, Morris Play

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    03. Neuralink
    Andy Mart, Terry Smith

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    04. Chemical happyness
    Primal Beat, Kelsey Love

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    05. Brain control
    Grover Crime

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    01. Neural control
    Kenny Bass, Paul Richards

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    02. Prefekt
    Kenny Bass, Paul Richards, R. Galvanize

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    03. Illenium
    Grover Crime, J PierceR

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    04. Distrion Alex Skrindo
    Black Ambrose, Dixxon, Morris Play, Paul Richards

    add_shopping_cart
  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 010
    Kenny Bass

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 009
    Paula Richards

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 008
    R. Galvanize

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 007
    Kenny Bass

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 006
    J PierceR

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 005
    Gale Soldier

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 004
    Kelsey Love

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 003
    Rodney Waters

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 002
    Morris Play

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Live Podcast 001
    Baron Fury

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play