Why Rocket Lab Fails To Disrupt The Space Industry
For original short-selling research and much more check out our website: https://www.differentiatedanalytics.com/
Use promo code WSM50 at checkout for 50% off
In this video we analyze the rocket launch company Rocket Lab.
Follow us on Twitter / X: https://x.com/wallstreetmil
For inquires related to Differentiated Analytics email us at: founder@differentiatedanalytics.com
Check out our second channel Broken Business Models where we discuss unusual or otherwise suspect businesses that may be unviable: / @brokenbusinessmodels
For business inquires: Mary@creatormanager.co
For other inquiries: Wallstreetmillennial@gmail.com
All materials in these videos are used for educational purposes and fall within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of said material, please send me an email, wallstreetmillennial.com, and we can sort it out.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Buddha by Kontekst / kontekstmusic
Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0
Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/2Pe7mBN
Music promoted by Audio Library • Buddha – Kontekst (No Copyright Music)
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
#wallstreetmillennial #rocketlab #spacex
0:00 – 1:41 Intro
1:42 – 2:36 Founding of Rocket Lab
2:37 – 7:38 SPAC Transaction
7:39 Neutron Rocket

@thirteenthandy
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Numbers are numbers, and yet they can be misleading. For example, you showed their total growth and focused on how much of their revenue was brought in by their services segment rather than their launch segment, but didn't comment on the part of your chart that shows the launch segment has more than tripled from 2020 to 2024. Instead you focused on how short they've come under forecast for that segment. It just seems like a video made by a short seller. I'd rather watch videos from the rocket enthusiast channels, even if they're negative or skeptical. Most of them don't feel like they have ulterior motives.
@374willyd
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
What an uniformed video. Terrible video, will never watch another from this idiot.
@albertpaquin7876
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
5:05 you can't mulitply n of launches by maximum payload. 22 tons can only be acheived by expanding the rocket. with re-use its more like 18tons
@EdwinSherwood
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
I think amarica should support amarican companies if available
@cameron.t
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
3:03. Isn’t ULA a quasi-government organization comprised of three US defense companies that themselves are quasi-government?
So many glaring misdirections in this video, including this one point
This video is a litmus test 😂
@DoublePlus-Ungood
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
I'd have to disagree with that they haven't made any meaningful impact.
Just existing as a private space launch company is the meaning impact IMO, as I grew up with all of NASA and the Soviet Union, and that was it for a long long time.
@GD-L80
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
This is because Rocket Lab is self-financed through its industrial successes and does not seek money from third-party financiers by promising them stratospheric returns.
@billsimpson604
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
I don't see a carbon fiber first stage surviving reentry heat without some expensive damage. If I'm right Rocket Lab is probably toast. I hope I am wrong.
@ChristoherWGray
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
The minute I heard Cathie Wood
Im out!
@asiantownvideos
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
nasa , spacex etc are all scams. no one can go to space, no one can prove propulsion inside a vacuum is possible. try prove the "recoil" theory works inside a big vacuum chamber, not small vacuum tube where exhausts refill and hit the solid barrier.
@PresidentBob1989
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
A bit of misleading. Rocketlab was able to reuse rockets that they recovered from the sea.
@dougphillips239
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Strikes me as an overdose of sour grapes.
@gamermatchmx
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
This aged like milk
@milleddtube8755
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎
@HUNTER72606
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
RKLB isn't supposed to disrupt the space industry. So Stop trying to paint a picture that doesn't want to be painted at this time. We'll get back to you when we are ready to reset the stage. Got it. So stop misleading people that don't know any better.
@NULL4546-m1v
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Nice video. This made me sell my position in rocketlab and certainly woke me up to the reality that its still a small rocket company and the delayed neutron launch will likely hurt the stock. I will be safe rather than sorry and sell. If they do launch and things look good I can always buy at a higher price again
@Soulslike420
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
SpaceX also started small so yeah🤷🏽♂️
@aznbrosss
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
This isn’t aging well😂
@JohnyByou
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Thank you bother, you made up my mind on buying Rocket Lab. Hope everyone who did invest get a positive outcome.
@jermunitz3020
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Haha this video has aged like milk. RKLB stock has pumped 100% in the last month.
@Bnryzombie
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
4 52 week highs this month alone is all I need to feel comfortable with my $5.22 shares. You missed the fact that their are the US Governments only private launcher of hyper-sonic test vehicles. I have stock gain on this stock of +850%
@dosmastrify
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Your shit due diligence continues to show itself. Over 50 a share right now.
Never half ass and half truth us again ok??
@shrimpboy944
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Stock up 75% in the past month and revenue projections just jumped from $443 million to $2.9billion for 2029.
@Blakenblitz
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
The key points of your bear case analysis, such as RKLB underdelivering on organic revenue targets, make sense. The problem is that at the end of the day none of that will likely matter. The bottom line is that rocket technology is viewed by the Federal US government as a strategic asset, and they will never allow the market to become a pure monopoly with SpaceX which is why RKLB is continuing to win government contracts despite not being the industry leader. Ultimately the launch market is effectively just SpaceX, Blue Origin, RKLB, and Firefly right now, with SpaceX far in the lead. A bet on RKLB is a bet on the catch up opportunity, which should happen much more quickly relative to how long it took SpaceX to build that lead in the first place. Maybe shares dip on an earnings release when they announce a Neutron delay, but outside of that a short position will get CRUSHED on the duration between earnings events.
@ankeborg9122
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Misleading and inaccurate information. Aged like milk too.
@johnking9942
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Cathy Woods is a loser whisperer.
@LostAnFound
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Fail my ass!
Are you even aware of who is hiring them?
@JjAnteros
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
hope and optimism are very powerful in the stock market, also if this rocket is not viable it makes sense to delay the rocket for as long as possible, the stock has been on a run, but u failed to mention that, and your videos have taken a more skeptical look at many companies, people tend to not like short sellers, so I'm not sure why u keep promoting short sellers on your channel, it's not a very smart move if u ask me, it would be much smarter to promote companies that u actually like compared to companies which u dislike, and everyone knows that SpaceX is currently the leader in this arena, so I'm not sure why u needed to bring them up every other minute in this video, you're acting like competition is bad, and SpaceX having a monopoly is good lol, most people dislike monopolies and tend to favor competition, literally one of the key pillars in Capitalism tends to be healthy competition, being skeptical of a few companies is one thing but being skeptical of every company is another, honestly u sound like u work for a hedge fund at this point, which is not a good look btw
@Bare_Hammer
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
This is the video of a person who holds a short position.
@Boofedit
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
I thought it was pretty clear that beck has given up and is looking towards retiring with his riches..
@Boofedit
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Because the rocket is tiny and the fact stands that they can only build 1-2 per month is pretty bad.
Especially when space-x is building a rocket 55x larger and more powerful and they can build more than 5 per day…
Rocket lab is very far behind the industry standard.
@neilknightley4703
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Its funny how you constantly compare it to spacex yet not once u mentioned how spacex gwts its core support from . The US govt. It got subsidies, elons funding and nasa contracts. This company had non yet still progressing .
We should keep this in persoective
@elroy-r5m
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Poorly researched video overlooking so many things.
@kosukeyoshimura1632
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
However, We all agree that the current share price of Rocket lab is too high.
Need to come down so I can buy back. It’s more expensive than Space X.
@vevenaneathna
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
like how you are not afraid of posting contrarian views to what every hype space channel is spewing out. imo rocket labs issue is they picked seth rogan as their ceo lol
@MB032MB
September 16, 2025 at 7:51 am
Ohh wow, what a research 😂
Comments are closed.