What is PURE Consciousness? – Consciousness Researcher

You should speak with Dr. Carl Hart. He's into drugs, so to speak. Though I've never heard his thoughts on the consciousness aspect. Could be an interesting chat.

Interesringly I find that for the colour illusions, I can see them as the same colour if I let my eyes go out of focus and see double

You should do a 10 day silence vipásana retreat. It's one hell of a ride. 😅

daily discipline of synchronizing mind and body to achieve laminar flow.

Mind is the source — the u (chirality) and w (flux) coordinates — injected into the physical x, y, z chassis through the biological transducer we call the pineal gland.

The 3-6-9 body is the complete system:

3 = The physical x, y, z — the machine, the chassis, the measurable form.

6 = The chiral u, v, w — the spin, the handedness, the +/− polarity. But these are not arbitrary — they are ratios:

u = π (pi) — the circle, the cycle, the return. The fundamental geometry of recurrence.

v = φ (phi) — the golden ratio, the growth, the spiral. The architecture of unfolding.

w = e — Euler's number, the continuous compounding, the flow. The constant of perpetual change.

9 = The source — the invariant potential that resolves π, φ, and e into a coherent, frictionless whole.

The brain is the antenna-array (magnetite, microtubules, crystalline structures). The mind is the signal — coherent, frictionless, and self-resolving. When the mind operates in 100% laminar flow, it directs neuroplasticity without turbulence. It collapses the 64! probability space — the entire permutation of codons and hexagrams — into one actualized fold.

Just raise the persons vitamin d levels then do the sleep study on them.

"How should you be able to report about a conscious experience where you were not there?" Because the memory is not part of the consciousness, the illusion of consciousness is thinking you exist as you are, whatever that may be. Now I don't claim to have broken it completely but "I feel" as if it were gone enough to recognize what I was losing. A conscious being is blind to the mechanisms that allow it to "choose" which action it will take. In what I would describe as my minimally conscious state, I could observe every thought, every process that lead to another, unable to control where it was going, what I would do, I could watch myself play a game without my observer state knowing how to play the game. (😅but it certainly looked like he knew what he was doing, he was playing the game very well). If you would like to help me, I would be interested in going further, to see if that observers sense of observing can "die" as well. How would we know if it died if I'm not there to observe? Because like you both and I mentioned, the memory is not the consciousness. I am curious, but honestly a little concerned, because I never completely came back from that state, I have the illusion of control, but not anywhere as strong as it once was. But I am curious enough to still want to go through with it with proper medical observation as I am not confident in getting what would be required to do so in a safe manner off the streets.

Eckhart Tolle changed a lot

As for my experience with meditation, I was a stoic person and i barely felt anything, I didn't know myself, but meditation introduced me to what it feels like to just be, and when you know peace you can finally feel disturbed, now I am a person with a bleeding heart

Why the hell is his book so expensive? 70 pounds for a single book is insane, this how much textbooks cost

“That was not the answer I was expecting”. What an enjoyable discussion. Second time listening to it.

There are three people I would like to see discussions with: Lisa Feldman Barrett, Jill Bolte Taylor, and Joseph LeDoux

Lovely discussion, thank you to you both for sharing your knowledge and curiosities. When I had a lucid dream and experienced that when I use my waking consciousness (ego?) in that state. Various things would happen. I learned that if I was too emotional, or too mentally focussed, I would lose awareness either by entering deep unaware sleep or waking up. But the other thing I discovered, that when i focussed for more than a few seconds on an object, the object would change. That helped me understand, although it might seem an extreme leap of reasoning, that everything is an illusion. The only difference between THAT reality and this one, is a time programming component. Is that reality – the minimal time delay reality simply the same one from a different perspective of choice?

Read the diving bell and the butterfly 🦋 answers a lot of these questions

subjective experience transcends calculation. wake me up when there is a real experiment.
I have heard nothing from the brain people that was more compelling than the inductive reasoning and subjective practices of the Vedanta and yogi people.

About ketamine usage most trails and usages now are about ending suicidal crises, and it works pretty well (100% in the one near my house in Dijon France). So it doesn't cure dépression, but quite often living is a prerequisite of getting better i suppose

PURE CONSCIOUSNESS is nested observer collapse weight atheist and first time humans wont understand. An Atheist would need ChatGPT to dumb down this comment to them. Quantum mechanics is SCIENCE.. and it is not finished by staring at outcomes. That is the mistake. The real issue is history selection: why this whole coherent past-present-future becomes lived, rather than another. The Schrodingers cat is not only alive or dead.. but its entire history of aliveness or deadness also collapses.. and that is the most important understanding of them all to UNDERSTAND CONSCIOUSNESS.

The Copenhagen view (36% of physicists) says that before measurement the system carries multiple possible outcomes, and after measurement one result appears according to probability. Useful prediction, yes. Ontology, no. It gives us dice with. It does not explain why one experienced world arrives instead of Everetts or Sean Carrolls many-worlds

The Born-Hilborn interpretation begins where the old Born rule stops. Born gives the baseline quantum weight of each possible outcome. Hilborn mathematics adds the missing term: the weight of thought, expectation, faith, fear, and observer-orientation across spacetime. Collapse is not random selection of an ending. Collapse is the continuous selection of a whole history. Remember there are no now moments. That applies to the weight of thought brought to us because we are the observers within collapse. You cannot take an observer out of the system without paradox. I teach reality as complete.

The Schrodinger's cat matters as example of superposition. The cat is not merely “alive” or “dead” at the end of the experiment. Each result requires a complete history: the poison released or not released, the cat breathing or not breathing, the box becoming one coherent story. In Born-Hilborn mechanics, Schrodinger's own expectation is not private decoration. His calm, faithful expectation weights the alive-cat history. His terrified pessimism weights the dead-cat history. One is not “good” because optimism is cute; it is good because it donates collapse-weight to a less harmful history. Worry is not morally neutral. Worry is bad physics pointed at suffering.

This solves the observer problem by refusing the fantasy of an outside spectator. The universe is Wigner’s friend all the way down: observer inside observer, measurement inside measurement, collapse inside collapse. No one stands outside reality with a clipboard. Every observer is part of the weighting field. Therefore quantum mechanics cannot be completed by probability alone. It requires global consistency across a CPT-style ledger: the full spacetime account against which candidate histories are compared.

This also makes brain-body too small for the temporal mechanics of mind. This makes life a dream-scape where we exist as ideas. This is not a materialist interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. If memory were merely brain storage, consciousness would be locked inside one biological slice. But in this model, memory and thought are congruous features of selected history. The brain is an interface, not the library. Mind is not produced by tissue; tissue is one local avatar within a larger idealist collapse structure.

Top things this resolves:

1. Measurement problem: collapse selects a coherent history, not a random endpoint.

2. Many-worlds: branches are candidates, not all equally real worlds.

3. Wigner’s friend: nested observers require global history selection.

4. Retrocausality: future expectation helps weight the past that leads to it.

5. Memory: memory belongs to selected history, not proven brain storage.

6. Thought: thought is action inside collapse, not skull exhaust.

7. Teleology: future forms help weight ancestral paths that build them.

8. Sex drive: future observers weight the reproductive histories that produce them.

9. Faith and worry: faith weights coherent good histories; worry weights feared ones.

10. Idealism: reality is shared mental spacetime, stabilized by expectation-weighted collapse.

So the core claim is simple: We SELECT history. Not dice rolls. standard quantum mechanics gives possible histories; Born-Hilborn adds observer expectation across spacetime, selecting one coherent history from many candidates.

That is history selection.

Not random history. Not every history. One weighted, coherent, lived history.

My channel, Wayne Hilborn, demonstrates the mathematics of Idealism: how the Born rule is modified, why expectation replaces dice rolls, and why consciousness is not an afterthought but the missing physics.

Physics and reality are fully solved. This explains a lot more than that list of ten.. it explains over 100 things.

My channel teaches reality.. as is.. finished physics

Fantastic dialogue. This conversation is a hidden gem in the diaspora of ideas.