The Paltry Economics of Drone Warfare
Go to https://ground.news/wsm to stay ahead of the algorithm for breaking news stories about finance and market insights. Sign up through my link to get 40% off for unlimited access on the Vantage plan.
In this video we analyze the economics of drone warfare.
Follow us on Twitter / X: https://x.com/wallstreetmil
Check out our second channel Broken Business Models where we discuss unusual or otherwise suspect businesses that may be unviable: / @brokenbusinessmodels
For business inquires: Mary@creatormanager.co
For other inquiries: Wallstreetmillennial@gmail.com
All materials in these videos are used for educational purposes and fall within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of said material, please send me an email, wallstreetmillennial.com, and we can sort it out.
#wallstreetmillennial
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Buddha by Kontekst / kontekstmusic
Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0
Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/2Pe7mBN
Music promoted by Audio Library • Buddha – Kontekst (No Copyright Music)
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
0:00 – 2:23 Intro
2:24 – 4:41 Modern Drone Warfare
4:42 – 8:16 AeroVironment
8:17 – 11:12 Kratos
11:13 Red Cat

@wallstreetmillennial
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Go to https://ground.news/wsm to stay ahead of the algorithm for breaking news stories about finance and market insights. Sign up through my link to get 40% off for unlimited access on the Vantage plan.
@hackedbyBLAGH
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Not how you use begs the question
@noodle3768
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Flying a fighter jet autonomosly is 1000 times easier than self driving car. You don't have people jwalking at the height.
@noodle3768
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Imaging the $10 million drone be jammed, and drop like flys.
@RasOnVrJR
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Too efficient to be profitable, our military is about making profit so we will find it difficult to adapt to drone warfare
@FabioCapela
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
It's not that supplying those cheap drones can't be done at a profit; it's just that it takes the kind of low cost supply chain that China has to do so. After all, DJI is still profiting on each of its drones or drone parts that get smuggled into Ukraine or Russia, and that despite a lot of the money spent on those drones going into the hands of intermediaries (and for good reason, DJI has threatened to blacklist anyone they catch working as an intermediary to Russia or Ukraine).
@hehe-mq2bk
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
20k drone for what u can get in China for less than a 1000 is such a rip off LMAOOOO
@hehe-mq2bk
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
the fact ur not mentioning how China literally supplies the quad copter drones on both sides is such an oversight
@adissentingopinion848
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Btw, it is far easier to create autopilot for a normal plane than for a car in principle. For one, nobody is skimping on money for the autopilot like a Tesla. Second, there isn't any traffic or turned over trucks or pedestrians in the skies aside from airports and flight corridors. Dead reckoning can get you far even with GPS blocked. The issue is keeping a man-in-the-loop for weapons on the drone and the high difficulty of the air defense arms race. The analysis is correct, just poorly explained in relation to autonomous automobiles.
@mymaruops
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
US army contractors just keeps ripping them off. its sad. 20,000 per quadcopter drone ?
@prestonmiller8485
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
AI pilots will not replace manned fighters in our lifetime.
Lol. How long do you plan on living?
@stephenlevy1011
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
It’s wild to you say ai won’t replace fighter pilots within our lifetimes with that much confidence. Like genuinely what a ridiculous claim.
@mikebaker2436
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
2:30 The American Interstate TDR was an aerial assault drone from WW2. It was developed in 1942 and saw limited use. A couple hundred were built.
@ObiWanCannabi
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
too cheap to profit, the warmachine in a nutshell.. we arent countries, we are arms dealers
@veerkar
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
I do not understand why he says AI cant beat humans at driving and flying. Firstly FSD is better than humans by a factor or 1:12 or better. Second, human fighter pilots are restricted by G-forces, while UAVs are not. In military exercises done by USA – human vs AI – AI won 100 out of 100 times. All ALS landings in bad weather are done by AI and not by humans – even while landing commercial jets with 400 passengers. In fact all landings done today in really bad weather are done by AI and it is indeed illegal to do the same landings by a human alone. Yes humans supervise it but AI is far superior than a pilot with 20 yrs of experience at least in the micro-aspects of flying. And landing and takeoff are by far the most risky part of a flight plan. Clearly AI has beat humans. This creator does not have depth in his research I think.
@rhobot75
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
TBH I'm a bit relieved the economics are so paltry. I've been worried about drones ever since I first saw the BlackMirror episode, HATED IN THE NATION.
@ethanboyd7843
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Remember that time AI Industry leaders wrote an open letter urging a pause in dev cause it was so capable it was dangerous? Then they released their product and laughed all the way to the bank.
@JasonPD-m9u
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
I generally like most of your analysis here, but I wanted to point out that tasks that humans find easy or hard to learn bears little relevance for tasks that AI finds easy or hard to learn. Human children can run across difficult terrain with debris, and fold laundry. Both of these tasks are extremely difficult for AI. Humans find learning to drive and fly safely moderately difficult, and learning to fly a spacecraft extremely difficult. AI finds flying spacecraft trivial. The US military has already conducted a variety of experiments where AI was able to out dogfight highly trained human pilots. The fairness and applicability of these tests is highly debated, but I don't think we are decades from AI dogfighting supremacy.
@ClivesEnglishCorner
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Outstanding content as usual
@crypto_que
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
I saw a Ukranian unit call in its own air support while clearing houses on the battlefield. They realized there were enemy soldiers in the house next door, so they deployed a drone with a l@nd m1ne and dropped it on the house next house over. It was the most Looney Tunes thing I've ever seen.
@TyeshaSutter
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Adaxum’s focus on real-world applications makes it a standout project in the crypto market.
@ZxZ239
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
sorry man, China got to it first, otherwise if it were developed within US, they would easily 10x the cost.
@MrVanMises
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
It's a shame to have yet another article about Musk placed in the video. The video is great as it is, no need to mention Musk (who by the way is a flamboyant nazi)
@rednose1966
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
I’m aware of the company that you’re talking about. I almost took some of their training but I would have to have paid for it and it was in the thousands of dollars.
From what you showed of the lineup of aircraft this company had zero good aircraft being used in Ukraine.
$90,000 a shot wow talk about going broke.
@tellyboy17
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Seems wrong to deny potential of autonomous flight based on the failure of autonomous driving as the complex realities of modern traffic are a lot harder to navigate than a basically completely obstacle free airspace.
@MooMooMoney
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
Nice video! However you are completely and utterly wrong on your point at 11 minutes that autonomous drones will not replace fighter pilots in our lifetime. I think it is naive to assume AI can’t handle arial navigation in the future because it is already being done. Palladyne AI and Redcat already demonstrated AI navigation on a swarm of small drones. This tech is not even hugely funded yet. Also your comparison to full self driving is also wholly incorrect. It is actually easier to navigate in a 3D space using geographic landmarks where there are virtually zero obstacles in the sky and you are not adhering to regulations for a consumer automobile. I don’t think we are far away from seeing fully functioning AI powered small scale drones and later large scale drones such as the KTOS systems. That includes AI navigation and targeting. Anyways I would be happy to hear a counter point but maybe rethink that argument because I think it is way off.
@Tripple_Threatt92
January 28, 2026 at 10:41 pm
I would just add the TB2 is a suicide drone and the XQ-58 is more like an automations fighter jet. It would fly side by side with the F-35z Much higher capability with the latter
Comments are closed.