The Deadliest Weapons In Every Time Period

Chill on saying plethora pls bro

Im not a die hard fan but trusy n believe if im watching another video and i see in the corner of my eye a trustmebro vid unwatched that other vid musttttttt be put on hold🙂‍↕️

I always like the video after I watch it even though I know I’m gonna like it.

Fun fact: Maxin considered his invention potentially life saving, since it would turn all war into just couple guys shooting each other far away. He believed no sane person would make soldiers run towards someone wielding, no one would be that heartless. Man was he wrong

The whole video is just sharp shi and projectiles for 80% pf the vid, then, gunpowder, then FUCKING NUKE

Um, I think you forgot about the puckle gun. That was there very first automatic machine gun created by puckle himself.

26:40 in modern warfare, most of the deaths aren't caused by infantrymen with assault rifles, but by artillery shells fired over the horizon.

Deadliest weapon: high explosives in general for me.

Also, you can't detonate a nuke without compressing the core with HE

Aw man I was hoping you’d mention the sling!

Thinking cod players would spend their time on anything historical even if extremely entertaining is very generous

The first really was just a rock. It is genus defining. No other animals except hominids can throw anywhere close to as well as we can. Much stronger primates are much worse at throwing.

All these eras are generally defined around European history and completely disregard rest of the world. What's funny is the fact that European civilisations came up much later than other global civilisations. Hahaha

I lowkey learn more from ur vids than in history class /j /silly

It was always dysentery, wasn't it, until recently? The reason to not do war, was you'd die by poopy/ vomit, for most of it.

Bro really likes that stock heavenly choir sound effect

Early guns were actually inferior in range, fire rate, and accuracy compared to bows, but they were still chosen because it’s far easier to use. Training an archer to hit a target at a hundred yards takes years. Training a musketeer to volley fire takes mere days. This meant that even though a trained archer at the time was an overall more effective fighter than an early musketeer, an army that used primarily archers could not replace fallen archers as quickly as an army that used musketeers, nor could archers be trained quickly to scale up forces in times of war the same way. All of Human history shows us that in war numbers do in fact matter quite a lot and it was for this reason that the world focused on developing firearms over continued use of bows en masse.

@6:19 killer nail polish omggg