menu Home chevron_right
SCIENCE

The CERN Experiment That Made Scientists Ask a Dangerous Question

Fexl | September 10, 2026



A microscopic black hole created at the LHC, with a mass measured in a few teraelectronvolts, would exist for an almost impossibly short amount of time. Current predictions put its lifetime at about ten to the minus twenty-seventh of a second. That number is so small that, in that entire span, light would not even travel the width of an atomic nucleus. The black hole would disappear before it could meaningfully move, fall, or interact with anything around it. It would simply flash into existence and vanish immediately.

If these tiny black holes can form during high-energy particle collisions, they would not stick around or consume matter. Instead, they would evaporate almost instantly, releasing a sudden spray of particles as they disappear.

▀▀▀▀▀▀
Timestamps:
0:00 CERN
4:20 The Hierarchy Problem and Hidden Dimensions
11:20 How a Collider Makes a Black Hole
16:05 Why It Cannot Destroy Anything
22:45 The Hunt and the Silence

▀▀▀▀▀▀
Subscribe to Our Doc Channel
https://www.youtube.com/@UCpFYKH_eSPdKsuXdlVMI9xQ

Written by Fexl

Comments

This post currently has 31 comments.

  1. @SvenPilecki

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    W moim przekonaniu ten sprzęt jest za duży i nie działa prawidłowo.
    CERN to miejsce wielu przekrętów.
    Pralnia gigantycznych pieniędzy i pokazywanie symulacji komputerowych. Muszą kontynuować kłamanie aby nie wyszło na jaw, że sprzęt ma defekt i nie działa poprawnie. Słychać jakiś nagły huk i rozbłysk światła i to ma być wiarygodne. Łatwe pieniądze 💸

  2. @RainbowSkyDancer

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    this is what we think, that gravity, we don't see all of it, and it's so weak bcz it's spread across several dimensions. but overall it's the same strength as the others. this would imply upwards of 36 dimensions, we guesstimated 42 but could be 24

  3. @Opterium

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    I see a complete lack of understanding regarding what space, time, and gravity actually are. Stephen Hawking came the closest, yet even he, it seems to me, didn't know a great deal. That is a bold statement, but I say it because it is my opinion – whether people like it or not.

  4. @satanofficial3902

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    "As the result of several peer-reviewed studies, scientists have determined that if they don't go along with consensus groupthink, they just won't be asked to participate in this year's reindeer games. The flicker fusion rate of Planck time provides a rare window into a more dynamic picture of food-safe calcium chloride displaying the quantum Zeno effect reinterpreting the randomness of aliens performing unscheduled rectal exams of the abducted in enchanting New Mexico. This is a spontaneous synchronization caused by trilobites expressing functional theory calculations. But still, you're left wondering why lemmings would care anything at all about participating in reindeer games. This needs to be a wake-up call for leaving the Bronx for brand new homes built from primordial blackholes and circularly polarized light. This finding offers a fresh perspective on the probability density of molecular gas clouds of bedbugs in interstellar space. That should set off every alarm you have that we didn’t discover electricity by studying the candle."

    —Albert Einstein

  5. @gein2287

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    You should be worried about the numerous nuclear power plants that still make weapons grade nuclear material. Which is the only reason these useless war mongering animals commission these idiotic energy sources. Thorium would be a 1000X cheaper, 1000X safer and 1000X more productive being much smaller and way easier n cheaper to mine. It's waste product is not dangerously radioactive. And the byproducts can be used over n over again.

  6. @geoffc1694

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    'Its a 50 50 chance either it will happen or it wont. '
    That dont make it 50 50 thats an out of context abstraction.
    The closest truth is nothing is absolute 0% chance of happening and if you had to round up its closer to 1% than 0%.

  7. @carlos-dt2tz

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    Perhaps the “desert” doesn’t mean something is missing, but our current theoretical models are not correct enough or there is an issue with certain assumptions beyond our current thinking and the mathematics to describe it?

  8. @johnaquillo1975

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    Ummm…maybe I'm suffering from a personal Mandela effect but haven't I've seen this before – is this a re-upload? The first minute or so of this video I'm sure I've seen before, maybe last year?

  9. @BruceChesham

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    The protons are from electrified Helium. Why not smash something with weight like Iron protons or even Neutrons. See what the other side of an Atom has to offer. Pathetically limited exploration.
    Billions of dollars spent just to make sure a few notes on a piece of paper are correct. Useless waste of money and time.
    A black hole started by a singular Atom colision is a ridiculous fantasy.

  10. @crunchbite005

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    I don't really think it's fair to grade any force force by its strength or weakness, beyond a title they don't care about, mainly because these forces are fundamentally different at scale. Should the electromagnetic force be seen as weak because of a lack of reach across galaxies? No. Each force has characteristics apart from the whole, even though the whole is made up of the parts of force. Like saying offense is the best defense. Context is matter.

  11. @jasonwalton5409

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    Black holes that are under a certain amount of mass, will just evaporate because the hawking radiation will outpace the rate which it consumes mass / background radiation.

    The LHC is about 1,000,000,000x too weak to be able to create a black hole of meaningful proportions, (which is good for us)

  12. @TheAtomicOrchard

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    The context is important, in the top_down phase inversion process, it is not a singular event that collapse's the "Universe", you need certain paramiters to all be present ,within a finite location of spacetime., the first "phase" ingedient, is something humans can never create, or reproduce, it is known as PAGE-TIME. the exact moment the expansion of the Universe reaches MAX expansion. So any chance of a time dependant phase inversion, is zero from a human perspective. Now for a bottom_up unintentional inversion, is not impossible for humans to achieve, CERN is exprementing at closer and closer finite domain, wher activation could, could accidentally produce an "inside-out", BOTTOM_UP change in phase condition of our Universe, but we are not nearly in the ball park, you can class it as being a near impossibility occuring at CERN, for a number of reasons i wont go into here. But the actual danger is not being done in all the particle colliders through out the Earth, they are being allready three quarters of the way there, and that is in the realm of QUANTUM computers. The race to find Q-bit production, allready is operating with two of the three phase's needed to unfurl strings from the small planck scale domain. First almost ZERO TEMPERATURE is allready maintained, that is coupled with second phase ingredient, Q-BIT production, last i checked it was about approaching 1000 q-bit entanglement. All it needs now is for a phantom particle to dechorere the WHOLE system, the Universe would artificially "think" it was in contraction mode, think reverse entropy, and dimensionally instant collapse. There you have it, the bulseye of the dartboard is being made larger and larger, by Q-Bit production, so the chance of hitting the bull, is exponentially greater.

  13. @Mike80528

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    I thought that the experiments with LIGO proved there are only 3 dimensions as it has shown gravity decays at the same rate as photons, meaning it decays in only 3 dimensions. If there were more, the decay rates would diverge.

  14. @aricmor

    September 10, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    7:20 Yet the space between galaxy exists. Yet we still barely understand what the spaces between galaxy hold. Our observable is not even the largest. Zooming out to multi-dimensional space where you could see every universes and the space between them. Reality is like nesting dolls.

Leave a Reply





This area can contain widgets, menus, shortcodes and custom content. You can manage it from the Customizer, in the Second layer section.

 

 

 

  • play_circle_filled

    92.9 : The Torch

  • play_circle_filled

    AGGRO
    'Til Deaf Do Us Part...

  • play_circle_filled

    SLACK!
    The Music That Made Gen-X

  • play_circle_filled

    KUDZU
    The Northwoods' Alt-Country & Americana

  • play_circle_filled

    BOOZHOO
    Indigenous Radio

  • play_circle_filled

    THE FLOW
    The Northwoods' Hip Hop and R&B

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play