Space Lasers? Anti-Satellite Missiles? The Future is Now | NOVA | PBS
Explore the state-of-the-art tools of modern space warfare.
Space warfare is no longer science fiction. Explore the tech behind it allโ from laser “dazzling” systems that can blind enemy satellites, to missile systems that can obliterate them. As the latest space race continues to escalate, will the next battlefield be an orbital zone?
๐บ Watch the full documentary, _Space Wars_ : https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/space-wars/
๐ฐ Stay up to date on the latest science discoveries, full episodes, articles, videos, and more by signing up for NOVA’s newsletter here: https://to.pbs.org/4brCC7Y
โถ๏ธ Stream NOVA documentaries & more with PBS Documentaries on Prime Video: https://amzn.to/4hXBlsu
๐ Help us bring the universe closer to home. Your donation ensures that NOVAโs deep-space discoveries and quantum physics explorations remain free and inspiring for the next generation of scientists. Support fact-based storytelling today. https://bit.ly/48UnsrD
๐ Follow on social for more NOVA content
Twitter: https://twitter.com/novapbs
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/novapbs
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@novapbs

@DerickJohnson-g3t
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
High powdered lasers "Couldn't imagine that"
@SwissChocolate-m2j
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Are those the Jew lasers what they were talking aboot?
@Alan-z7i6t
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Mankind will eventually destroy itself
@search8914
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Most space-based defenses are classified.
@twotrackjack2260
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
"its just another way to die"
– Disturbed
@Matthew-h1y4l
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
1985 real genius
@OhWellHereIAm
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
"If I stare at the lock really hard, it will burst into flames and melt."-Bolt
@indica8510
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
When flat earth is reintroduced for safety reasons in schools (itโs like a hand rail) no one will still care about space itโs not safe to. The earth is flat.
@Sebastian-jk9kk
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
For the algorithm!
@williambranch4283
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
See Starwars 40 years ago
@track1949
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Narrator sounds like Leonard Nimoy.
@DroidPADhome
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
This technolgy has existed & has been deployed since early 80's…tell me different
@jesus773
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Same technology used in Hawaii and California
@KirkCA
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Laser dazzling is easy enough to defeat with wave length filters. Also it seems like America, China and Russia owe the world free cleaning services for earth orbit.
@desijrichert
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Everybody knows that if ANYBODY starts blowing up satellites in orbit it's going to take out way more than just the enemies' satellites so they don't. Too big a risk to our own satellites. And didn't the United States sign a treaty saying they wouldn't orbit those types of satellites?
@desijrichert
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
People have been imagining using lasers since WAY BEFORE they were invented. H. G. Wells ring any bells?
@LucienLevesque
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
As the accumulation of space debris can cause a problem in utilizing space for satellites and other orbiting space technology, the question comes into mind, how could we effectively capture space debris and remove it from orbit as opposed to simply waiting for it to leave orbit??? Well, say the space debris is travelling at 17 000 km/hr, to intercept it is one thing, but to capture it and clean it up is a matter of introspection… As travelling at a high speed, the best way to capture it would be to have something like a blanket of silk, but a very concentrated blanket of silk, as silk is a very strong impenetrable object. But how do you make the capturing of space debris possible as even silk would be penetrated at 17 000 km/hr when it is relatively stationary? If you had a blanket of heavily layered silk that travelled in the same path as the space debris, but travelled slightly slower than the space debris, say at 16 999 km/hr, then the space debris travelling at 17 000 km/hr would only be making impact with the silk blanket at 1 km/hr, as there is only 1 km/hr difference in speed between the space debris and the silk blanket. Tests could be done on earth prematurely to understand if space debris would penetrate a silk blanket at 1km/hr, so that the silk blanket could be layered enough to allow the debris to be captured. The silk blanket could be shaped like an umbrella cone and then have the space debris collect towards the interior of the silk umbrella cone, where it would then be transferred into something like a garbage container where it could be stored. By measuring the space debris in terms of mass and surface area, the calculations could be done to have the space debris collected in orbit and removed by having the silk blanket be strong enough to resist the impact of space debris by travelling at a speed very close to the space debris effectively reducing the impact being made by the space debris and not puncturing the silk space blanket, then stored into a garbage like container within the interior of the space blanket and then have the means of rocket propulsion to descend safely back to earth and then effectively remove space debris from orbiting the earth making space safer again. Obviously the space silk blanket would have to be deployed into orbit first, and then have a speed close to the space debris within the same line of orbit but slightly slower travelling in the same direction and the space debris could then be collected, stored and removed from orbit and then descend back to earth. This is only a hypothesis of how to remove space debris, but it can be done, as space debris travelling at 17 000 km/hr does not make impact at 17 000 km/hr when the capturing of the space debris device is travelling at say 16 999 km/hr, making it only 1 km/hr of an impact speed onto the capturing device mechanism. Think about it, as eventually cleaning up the orbital space debris will be a matter of importance when it makes the orbiting space around earth relatively more dangerous when it is not addressed…
@joehopfield
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Glad this finished with a few sane voices. The first 5 minutes are a space force contractors propaganda (military ads paid for by taxpayers, again)
@bonecircuit
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Major laser
@robenheimer
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
world militaries are going to kill us all. reckless destruction of objects in orbit only happens when you have idiots in charge. which is, unfortunately, what most of the world has. certainly the united states in 2026. and yes, even highly educated people can be idiots.
@phil20_20
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Hydrazine be very dangerous โ ๏ธ
No, guys. Sorry, it will be AI in space next. Satellites that operate autonomously when they lose the signal from their controllers. Then you've got those little agents that love to invade other little systems.
@DianeEllis-xk1jj
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Crazy! Hopefully it will be used for the good! Time will tell.
@ReaperOfStories
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
We need to get Half Section up and running! Debris haulers are heroes who keep space safe! Plays the theme to Planetes
@ob15027
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
I was raised pn 1980's and 1990's Sci-Fi movies… BRING IT ON!!!๐๐ฝ๐ช๐ก๐ค๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐๐๐
@JosueCR-s6g
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Pueden usar el Lacer para Medir la Distancia.
@guygex2525
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
They already exist, from Regan star wars initiative 1983, lasers disguised as satellites.
@disolejunk
October 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
Its no big secret, do a Google search,that's what SpaceX is for. Defense and sending new equipment and technology that's not linked to anything in existence. Whole new type of war games. There's so much that they don't tell us.