Something Is Seriously Off With Antimatter at CERN

F'n AI.

Time reversal… hmmm .. clearly antimatter doesn't travel back in time. Nor is it negative energy. Could our model be wrong or incomplete at best?

AMS has detected multiple anti He nuclei. Fail.

Low key a catholic bishop coined the term "Big Bang", so if it falls outta fashion, I won't mind at all Haha

You see the explanation is quite simple for a refined intellectual like myself:
We live in the Matrix 😂

I've been enjoying these videos. The voice seems to be AI, but is the writing AI, or AI assisted?

Nu Try NOs, what the hell. Is this channel turned into some more AI generated BS. I thought this was a real channel but not so much anymore….

The Big Bang theory will soon be relegated to the title of an old TV show. Bigger telescopes show more stuff farther away and the universe keeps getting older. Soon it will be seen to be too old for the pesky theory!

After the big bang that maybe happened

“According to the math”. Obviously it doesn’t add up.

it feels far more like something happened that then caused everything else to become relative to it more than something created everything

Wot if da particals were in super position 🤔 n at da moment da last particals were about ta cancel each other out, something observed them 🤔

There is no violation of symmetry in the universe and I am convinced that the Big Bang produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Please bear with me, I will try to explain.

In the Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation, antimatter is calculated as regular matter moving backwards in time. That, in my opinion is not a mere mathematical tool but an accurate description of reality. Have you heard that Quantum Theorists consider that retrocausality might also be real? Now, combine the two. Antimatter is the same entity as matter with reversed CPT symmetry, reversed temporal direction and reversed causality relationship. The problem is that we can only perceive events happening in our own arrow of time. The past of an antimatter particle extends into our future. So, when we observe antimatter, we actually observe the trail of its past, falsely concluding that it moves in the positive temporal direction because we cannot perceive it otherwise. From this perspective, if you try to imagine an anti-apple falling and try to imagine it in its own temporal direction, then you have to see the anti-apple falling up from the ground and onto the tree. Essentially, you have to watch the story of antimatter backwards. In this view, antimatter's gravity is truly repulsive. What is more important, though, is its temporal direction.

During the Big Bang, matter and antimatter got naturally separated into two distinct CPT-antisymmetric universe halves. From our domain, we cannot look past the Big Bang, therefore we cannot observe all that antimatter which lies on the other side. Now, you may ask how can the mirror universe operate under repulsive gravity. The answer lies in the geometry of that domain, which is CPT-reversed. Antimatter gravity is attractive within that domain because it operates in a CPT-reversed spacetime geometry. In other words, the double CPT transformation, that of matter and that of spacetime geometry is what makes gravity attractive again. Therefore, the mirror domain of the universe has structure identical to our own.

If we try to think of a universe evolving into all directions of space and only one direction of time, that alone is a violation of CPT symmetry. So our current models must be wrong. A CPT-symmetric Universe with two antisymmetric halves feels a lot more elegant and intuitive and solves the mystery of the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry.

There are further implications of this hypothesis, such as what the actual mechanism of pair production and annihilation is. This underlying mechanism provides an elegant answer to quantum entanglement, the inexplicable property of matter that baffled Einstein himself. But I've already written too much. If anyone is interested in my reasoning, I could elaborate further.

This assumes a big bang creation and not some other genesis, such as Brane collision.

The standard model is as valid as astrology.

It’s an Electric Universe.

Did we survive?

I love your content it is probably the best researched and up to date on YouTube

Antimatter,created on earth is the only location in the Universe where we know anti-matter exist, matter antimatter collisions do not want to occur, so we have to artificially create them.