Something About Our Galaxy’s Black Hole Is Seriously Off

The whole concept of Black Holes is misconceived. A Black hole is what its name implies, it is a space where no nuclear matter exists. This is explained in the Hypothesis called ' The Two Monoparticle Universe ' by Tony Norman Marsh, black hole section pasted below.
Black Holes.

It is my view that the current accepted understanding of these phenomena may be confused by preconceived mathematical calculations of the fate of dying stars.

It is stated that when stars die, they explode in a supernova, then collapse into themselves to form a neutron star creating a black hole of immense gravity. These assumptions I believe are derived purely from mathematical equations.

If looked at logically the description above does not make sense. Firstly, if the star exploded forcing all of its matter out into space, why would it collapse back in on itself? It is argued that this is due to gravity, however, I would argue that gravity is a property of matter, and in such an explosion, all of the matter from the dead star, would have been spread throughout the surrounding area, and would most likely combine with surrounding stellar masses.

It is stated that it is just the outer layer that explodes of, who thought that one up? If a star is hot enough to explode, it is likely that the core would be molten and the whole star would disintegrate and be blasted out into the surrounding universe. From common logic, it will be realized that since gravity is a property of matter, there will be no gravity left where the centre of the star had been, except for the ‘ Harveytron ‘ cloud, which fills every empty space throughout the universe.

Depending on the size of the star that exploded and the speed at which it was rotating, will determine the size of the void left where the star had been, ( A Black Hole ).

This would result in a region of very little matter where the star had been. and due to the lack of aggregate mass, what debris that was left, would be forced out by centrifugal force, thereby forming a ‘Black Hole’ where the star had been.

Gravity within a Black Hole

In my model, I would contend that the gravity within the black hole would be just the same negative force of repulsion as that of the ‘Dark Energy’ resulting from the ‘Dark Matter’ ‘Harveytron’ cloud that I propose. It is very likely that within the black hole there would be very little or no Baryonic matter.

In essence, a black hole is just a vortex formed by the stellar matter revolving around it, the size of the black hole being dependent on how much matter is contained within that gravitational sphere.

Galaxy Birth and Formation.

I hypothesize that this is how Galaxies are formed.

When a star explodes and forms a black hole the additional matter and associated gravity that is spread out in the region surrounding the black hole where the star was situated, forms an embryonic galaxy, which gradually grows as matter is gradually acquired due to the fact that gravitational matter has been forced further out from where the star was situated.

It would be very unlikely that all of the matter that was exploded out from the star would collapse back to form the same star because between every pieces of the exploded matter, there will be the negative force of repulsion of the ‘ Dark Energy ‘ being produced by the ‘ Dark Matter ‘ ‘ Harveytron cloud ‘ forcing baryonic matter apart, depending on its mass and distance between each piece of matter. It is likely that small clumps would form dispersed throughout the area covered by the explosion. These small clumps will eventually evolve into embryonic stars as more matter is accreted over millions of years.

Galaxy Expansion.

I do not believe that matter is sucked into a black hole. I believe that the only thing that exists in a black hole is the ‘Harveytron Dark Matter Cloud’. We have to consider the fact that there are two sides to a black hole, so what happens on one side happens on the other.

Any baryonic matter that gets too near a black hole, including ‘Antimatter’, will be forced out to the edge of the black hole, slowly adding to the amount of matter and therefore gravity of this new galaxy. The size of the black hole at the centre, will be directly proportional to the amount of the positively charged ‘Dannytron’ particles contained in the nuclei of the baryonic matter in the galaxy, because this will determine how many of the negatively charged ‘ Harveytron ‘ particle are held in the atoms contributing to the overall mass of the galaxy.

If a black hole had the immense gravity that the standard model proposes, the black hole would not exist, as any matter surrounding it, would be pulled to the centre and a new star would exist.

Light and all Electromagnetic Radiation’,

The Accretion Disc, and Hawking Radiation.

Any light entering the black hole from either side, will be deflected out to the edge of the black hole, where it could cause a reaction similar to that of the ‘ Photoelectric Effect ‘ thereby accounting for the ‘Accretion Disc’, and ‘ Hawking Radiation’.

This is why, light does not reflect out of the centre of the black hole. It is not that it can’t escape the gravity of the black hole, it can, but from the perimeter of the black hole. It also will be realized that since there is no baryonic matter in the vortex of the black hole, there is nothing that light can reflect off of.

In my model, theoretically, you could pass through the centre of the black hole, where the centrifugal force should be zero, to reach the other side of the galaxy.

Conclusion.

Apart from the absurdity of everything that exists in the universe emerging from a singularity smaller than an atom, and this singularity inflating to the size of the universe in a fraction of a billionth of a second, the standard model still can’t explain ‘ Dark Matter ‘, ‘ Dark Energy ‘, what is the repulsive force field in the universe that stays at a constant pressure despite the supposed expansion of the universe, or ‘ Gravity ‘. It also can’t reconcile the conflict between quantum mechanics, classical physics, and cosmology.

The fact that the CMB can be seen in every direction, casts serious doubts on the validity of the currently accepted model.

The ‘ Big Bang ‘ theory, and the ‘ Relativistic Cosmological Model ‘, can only be justified by the ridiculous idea of ‘ Cosmic Inflation ‘, which defies logic, and violates all the laws of physics, including matter travelling through the universe at multiple times the speed of light. I contend that these facts, renders this theory disproved.

The two above hypotheses can explain logically many of the outstanding problems in physics and cosmology.

Hypothesis proffered by,

Tony Norman Marsh.

Quality video, great imagery and explanation. thanks.

Is it only one single cone being cleared in SagA* due to the outward pressure? Why not multiple cones, or a continuous envelope?

Awesome video 👌🙏🫡❤ idaf… idaf. Making sure i remember this invective dominated accretion flow. 😅😂 x7 in 2036. Can't wait ✨️🫡

I remember when I vacationed there!

Something "was" wrong 26,000 years ago.

Who on or off Earth is "Blu Narrate"?

The core of the Milky Way Galaxy has gone off in a massive chain reaction of supernovae, and the shockwave will be here in 20,000 years!!!

"Physicists have made a recent monumental discovery that the all-governing forces of time and space generate quantum communication through the ongoing miracle of metal foam made from kitty litter. When photons pass through a dense gas cloud, they send a number of atoms into electronically excited states known as Rydberg states impersonating fire salamanders. Nuclear fusion produces these within a massive star’s deep interior during its final stages of life. The everlasting life of rabbit tobacco made out of pure force explains how fundamental particles get their mass from squiggly oscillations of champagne wishes and caviar dreams. This is similar to how a bell rings after being struck. As matter collapses inside a black hole and densities rise toward the Planck scale, the Spain in plain falls mainly on the rain. Each vibration pattern carries quantum information about the visceral mass of acorn worms during the core collapse of the Cambrian explosion. The significance of this should be clear to one and all. "

—Albert Einstein

Undercover Rogue Ninja for the Sushinori Clan

"Once you go full ninja, you never go back."

—Albert Einstein

"Ninja to live. Live to ninja."

—Albert Einstein

"Generally speaking, your relatives are related to you. This is my theory of general relativity.

—Albert Einstein

Sagittarius A* is 26,000 light years away. I think we're probably safe this far away if it became active. Mind you that seems like another Fermi Paradox partial solution. It might well be that you don't get life too close to a galaxy's central black hole because once it becomes an active galactic nucleus it sterilises anything too close.

Why do y’all keep talking about me 😭
I’m on a diet that’s all 😭

No there’s nothing that suggest Sagittarius a* should be a luminous quasar, we know for a fact that active galactic nuclei is a product of earlier stages of galaxies or when larger mergers happen.

Your video is quite literally bs within the first minute