menu Home chevron_right
FUNNY STUFF

Should we end meetings forever?

Good Work | January 6, 2026



Meetings have taken over. It is time for a revolution. Right?

Join Dan Toomey and the Good Work Investigative News Team as we dig into our most earth-shattering corporate provocation yet: should we end meetings forever?

Thanks to Derek Thompson and Erik Shewalter for donning the spiritual trench coat with us.

Follow Derek: https://twitter.com/DKThomp

Video by Dan Toomey and Henry Stockwell

JOIN GOOD WORK’S PATREON FOR LIVE SHOWS AND MORE: https://www.patreon.com/cw/GoodWork

#meetings #corporate #GoodWork

Subscribe to GOOD WORK here: / @goodworkmb
FOLLOW GOOD WORK HERE: https://www.instagram.com/goodworkmb/
FOLLOW DAN HERE: https://www.instagram.com/dhtoomey/
SIGN UP FOR MORNING BREW HERE: https://www.morningbrew.com/daily/subscribe?utm_campaign=goodwork_yt&utm_medium=multimedia&utm_source=youtube

Should we end meetings forever?

Written by Good Work

Comments

This post currently has 49 comments.

  1. @sam_boh

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    [3:43] I think we're getting (or, I guess since I'm 2 years late to this, I should say we've gotten) to the crux of GameStop's issues if they're holding meetings upwards of 10 times a day because they need help making decisions.

  2. @MichaelMarquez-m3b

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    Management called meetings actually slow down progress on a task. I find the people who call these meetings and pop up to make cameo appearances in them are people who don’t really seem to have much to do themselves during the workday so they seem to need to interrupt the people who are actually busy trying to get the actual work done.

  3. @rhiclay4696

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    This captures how I feel about training for my new job right now. The trainer tends to ramble on without making much sense, goes off on tangents, and generally wastes the team's time. Half of the training is totally pointless and useless, while the other half actually provides some useful info. I mean, we’re all getting paid, right? Still, I’d happily clock out and take a pay cut just to avoid having my time wasted and to reclaim the countless hours of my life lost due to this trainer's "personal issues" and incompetence. I’ve had numerous chats with other team members who are just as frustrated with this trainer and the time we’re losing. All of the training is held via Zoom meetings. It’s almost funny at this point because of the secondhand embarrassment I feel for her. I’ve got two more weeks of training with this lady. Lord help me. 🙄

  4. @richacello339

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    Ironically, journalism is the profession which has the fewest meetings, because 1) you won't be in the office, because you're doing journalism and 2) you're on deadline. The People magazine story meetings in LA should have been turned into a sitcom as freelancers pitch ideas to editors who have already heard it all before.

  5. @AdmiralBonetoPick

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    I'm required to have a weekly project status meeting with a bunch of my colleagues. They appreciate how I usually get through everything in about 6 minutes and then they can get back on with their work.

  6. @danielsmith5032

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    The first few statements are lacking 😂

    Of course meetings tripled between 2020 and 2022. That was the height of Covid and everyone working from home. The lack of in person, gatherings and walk-by impromptu discussions led to more discussions via software.

    And the statement “that’s 1 hour of productivity and seven hours not” is erroneous. The data said it was eight hours per week in meetings, not eight hours per day.

  7. @EdwardianRainbow

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    The meetings we have wouldnt be all that bad if my director didnt deviate from the subject so much. A 30 minute meeting can turn into an hour because she wants to have some weird discussion about T-Shirts.

  8. @gustavalexander8676

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    Erik shelwalter just outed himself as a parasocial who has no actual friends but just people who is forced to interact with him at work. Newsflash; they're not there because they like you. They need to get paid.

  9. @fallenshallrise

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    I like to do the "meeting math". In a 1 hour check-in with 40 people invited you have to minus 5 minutes for everyone to join and for small-talk, minus 10 minutes for set-up from whoever is hosting the meeting, minus 10 minutes more for the other manager to repeat everything the other guy said, then you need 5 minutes at the end to wrap up. In a perfect world that only leaves around 45 seconds per person of speaking time if you want people at the meeting to actually answer questions or contribute anything.

  10. @fallenshallrise

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    Project Managers could just CLEARLY tell people what they need done and what the deadline is. Then if they miss 2 deadlines in a row you can start talking about having "stand-ups" and "check-ins". The more hand-holding you do the more people are just going to not bother managing their own time and will just sit around doing nothing until someone tells them step-by-step what to do next.

  11. @tticusFinch

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    So I'm in a company that's very meeting-heavy. Here's my perspective:

    1) people receive too many emails every day
    1a) people don't read their emails
    1b) people that do read emails scan them, thereby missing key information
    2) people are included on projects that shouldn't be included
    3) projects have too many people in them
    4) people block out their calendars with fake meetings to get work done

    I used to be the person who sent the email instead of having a meeting. But because of items 1, 1a, 1b I would either never get a reply or get a reply with a question that would have been answered had they read the email in its entirety. This is very frustrating and meetings in this case is simply blocking out time for a briefing and Q&A, plus whatever the ask is.

    Unfortunately, this quickly inflates when you need to talk to more than one person. Again, this could be an email with, say, four recipients but then you run into items 1, 1a, and 1b, plus everyone then assumes the other person will reply back which usually results in no reply at all. In which case you set a meeting. However, because of all the listed items, calendars rarely line up until 1-3 weeks out.

    And there are those who either will not or can not work on a project unless you schedule time for a "working meeting".

    As for those who might argue that you just do the work yourself, I literally cannot. Everyone has specialized knowledge or access or abilities that I could not do my work in isolation.

    I don't have a whole lot of actual output in my position. I attend and make a lot of meetings because that's how things inch forward.

    And let's not talk about office politics.

  12. @thepandadiaries

    January 6, 2026 at 4:49 am

    a really small detail that I love, whether or not it was intentional, is 4 participants in the Teams overlay. It could have been easily overlooked but hey, there were indeed 4 people in the meeting!

Comments are closed.




This area can contain widgets, menus, shortcodes and custom content. You can manage it from the Customizer, in the Second layer section.

 

 

 

  • play_circle_filled

    92.9 : The Torch

  • play_circle_filled

    AGGRO
    'Til Deaf Do Us Part...

  • play_circle_filled

    SLACK!
    The Music That Made Gen-X

  • play_circle_filled

    KUDZU
    The Northwoods' Alt-Country & Americana

  • play_circle_filled

    BOOZHOO
    Indigenous Radio

  • play_circle_filled

    THE FLOW
    The Northwoods' Hip Hop and R&B

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play