Physics Just Gave 4 Separate Proofs The Universe Is A Simulation The Last One Is The Most Disturbing

I swear to God modern science is the stupidest religionI've ever heard. The amount of faith it takes to believe this type of shit is literally astronomical

Fascinating Tom, where to next?

Phsyics doesn not give "proofs". This is completely wrong and clickbaity.

Physifs can only fail to disprove a hypothesis or theory. Proofs exist only in mathematics.

First of all the galaxy has been colonized. Different parts by different groups. Human being are special in the sense we are hybrid race and an ongoing project, which is not unheard of.
Fundamentally we are in a simulation but it is a simulation we are running ourselves. There is no deception unless you count self deception.

For those who believe nonhuman intelligence does not exist and is not known to humanity consider this.
It can be mathematically shown to people that the likelihood for intelligent life in the universe is overwhelmingly positive and likely. What is more probable, nonhuman intelligence is not on earth or the existence nonhuman intelligence on earth is being suppressed by government institutions?
We all know that government never suppresses information right?

Hey Tom,

Just a couple things I wanted to touch on for the last two points. As always I have been learning new things from your videos and they are quite fun.

First thing I wanted to discuss is your 3rd argument of the finite block and planks length. I think you are missing an important detail or two. I am not sure where the idea of a continuous universe will always have smaller and smaller particles comes from. If it is from classical mechanics which I believe you said, then it is likely wrong, since classical isn't a very good way to describe the universe at a quantum level haha, but now I guess I'll have to do some research. But you mentioned planks length is the smallest. The thought I had is that with quantum particles is as you go smaller and smaller the less they become solid objects and more waves like light. Light which has a mass of 0 and can have any length it wants even 0, it would just take an infinite amount of energy to reach it. So, I think light is the smallest building block of the universe, which can become increasingly smaller to a length of 0, but realistically never reach it. I'm not sure what could be more fundamental than that. I would think for any possible explanation of the universe it could not reach a particle of length less than or equal to 0. Of course as you mentioned that you would still reach a limit where length or distance is no longer meaningful when you reach planks length as time and space seem to break due to gravity or other factors.

This brings me to my second point of the mathematics argument. You bring up how mathematics isn't invented but discovered because it describes the world perfectly. Perhaps I am not understanding parts of your argument, but this seems like saying, cars would always exist because I found a road that fits a car perfectly. Or you could ask if the car was created to fit the road perfectly over many iterations. It's kinda a chicken or the egg argument. But even as you mentioned the math breaks down when you reach planks length and math even describes things being possible that physics does not, like a wavelength of 0. There are many other examples where the math was wrong as well like the luminiferous ether and ultraviolet catastrophe. It would seem to me that the with all the times math was wrong that it was definitely refined to fit the behavior of the universe. A useful tool, but I think we created the car to fit the road, not discover a car because we found a road. It seems more to me a testament of logical thinking.

Anyway thanks for the video, I'm looking forward to your one on free will.

Cheers.

Well can someone tell me how to put this shit in easy mode? I’m tired of the challenges, dang

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE:

* NO GRID DETECTED: Cosmic ray studies show no "pixelated" structure to space.

* ENERGY WALL: Simulating our universe would require more energy than exists within it.

* QUANTUM CAP: Quantum computers might hit a hard limit at 1,000 qubits.

* NO GLITCHES: Quantum entanglement shows no "rendering errors" yet.

* RENDERING THEORY: It's only feasible if the sim only "loads" what we look at.

I think you’ll find that real truths only require 1 proof. If you can’t prove it with 1 plain simple truth that everyone recognises then it’s not true my friend and you are trying to convince with proofs 2,3 and onwards.

All is math/code, but what is executing it; ie what game engine is running the simulation?

You’re making the case for a creator.