menu Home chevron_right
NEWS & CULTURE

I hate this Simpsons meme so much

J.J. McCullough | August 29, 2026



Rebutting the idea that the Simpsons depicted the “normal” socio-economic conditions of a typical middle class American family in the 1990s. Thanks to @TheRealJims for the voice cameo!

SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/jjmccullough?sub_confirmation=1

FOLLOW ME:

✋🏻 Support me on PATREON! https://www.patreon.com/jjmccullough
📷 Follow me on INSTAGRAM! https://www.instagram.com/jjmccullough/
✏️ Read my SUBSTACK: https://jjmccullough.substack.com
🤖 Join my DISCORD! https://discord.gg/3X64ww7
🇨🇦 Visit my Canada WEBSITE http://thecanadaguide.com

Some music by:
Craig Henderson- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtJbyhf1DnfQoVhwCJ6MIEQ
ComradeF- https://www.youtube.com/c/ComradeF

Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images

HASHTAGS: #simpsons

Written by J.J. McCullough

Comments

This post currently has 25 comments.

  1. @richardhighsmith

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    According the the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, a Nuclear Technician at a Nuclear Power Plant makes an average of about $115,000 per year. The median household income in the US is $81,000 per year, so Homer could support a family of five with that job today, especially if Springfield has affordable housing, the family only has one older car, and the power plan provides good healthcare benefits. Well maybe not the healthcare benefits, Burns is a miser. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/life-physical-and-social-science/nuclear-technicians.htm

  2. @JasonJrake

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    The meme works because my generation (born in the 1980s) grew up knowing that blue collar workers and high school dropouts could and did often own homes.

    It was way easier for anyone with work history to buy a home than it is now, due to inflation , supply, and other factors.

    None of us believe that The Simpsons was wholly realistic, but we believed that a man with bottom level until job could buy a house and take vacations, as surely as we knew that the characters on “Friends” couldn’t afford apartments that nice in a dying town, let alone Nee York.

  3. @burquidez

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    Or maybe Homer got pay raises over time and thus had more disposable income. They also could have locked in a better interest rate on the house at some point. My question is: how much does Homer spend at Mo's Bar every week?

  4. @KaitlynBurnellMath

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    A cousin of mine from Manitoba bought a small house for something like $10,000. If you're willing to live somewhere quite rural, property can be cheap.

    But yeah, here I am living in a 1 bedroom apartment with 3 other people. The downsides of living in the city.

  5. @annache250

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    To be fair, I always interpreted the Simpsons being a one income household as the reflection of Matt Groening’s and his fellow boomer writers’ childhoods in the 1950s and 1960s where housing prices were much lower relative to income. I feel like you kinda discount younger people’s very valid concerns over the cost of housing which makes certain life milestones seem out of reach.

  6. @Julianna.Domina

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    No, JJ, it's not about "lifestyle creep." Two people working overtime with no kids can't comfortably afford their rent, food, and even reasonable comforts. "You have a bigger TV than your grandpa!" doesn't change the fact that a cheap TV nowadays is a bigger percentage of your weekly check than a cheap TV would be decades ago, alongside everything else including rent.

  7. @Jakester0565YT

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    JJ I like your content a lot, but I think you kinda prove the point of America going downhill: everyone is extremely negative all the time from the top to the bottom, and nobody really wants to fix it; they just want to be mad at someone else. It's gotten mentally exhausting just being around it all the time and only seems to keep growing. Even within my own family, it's very bleak sometimes, and we aren't relatively that bad in terms of arguments

  8. @mylastcastle

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    I mean, it kinda depends where you live I would think. I got lucky growing up so I benefited not having to worry so much about living beyond my means but, still, in DC, my childhood home, before we sold it in 2009, was worth about 700k. Now, it's worth about 2.4 mil… Almost all houses in my neightborhood and around are over 1mil and can commonly approach 2mil, nothing particulary special about them either (lot of them will be renovated by developer, cause reasons) and I hate being pessimistic but there's no way I could afford anywhere close to this on 70k or even double/triple that so my time here is limited, unfortunately.

  9. @Laffinatu

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    I just very recently met a professor in a community theatre production and she teaches a class on how TV and film has molded a generation into believing certain realities that are in fact made up from entertainment and we accept them as truths. Example: fictional crime and law shows make us think we know the processes and procedures of law enforcement to the justice system when it can be totally inaccurate. I’m going to ask her about the Simpson and animated sitcoms when I see her next.

  10. @MultiJalmari

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    This is what I think: the man who made this video is correct and also smart. It might be a good idea to stop using social media and try to form you own, EDUCATED opinions. If you must fondle your smartphonw, try to find "head between the shoulders" videos like this one we just warched.

  11. @yanfrias946

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    Respectfully disagree. Them simpsons are an unusual family in the sense they had awnful behaviours. They had financial dificulties because Homer had no idea how to spend

  12. @ryuzakikun96

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    We have legitimate reasons to be pessimistic, stagnant wages, poor job market, rising home prices, burgeoning healthcare and childcare costs, off-shoring, competition with H1B1 migrants for high paying jobs, ballooning higher education costs, the almost certain necessity for dual income households, etc.

    The Simpsons satirizes perfect sitcom families, which as another youtuber pointed out, do not really exist anymore. These shows were already going out of style by the time the Simpsons really took off, so the tropes the Simpsons was making fun of is not the milieu it currently resides in. It kinda makes sense that a person living in 2026 watching modern Simpsons episodes would see the parody sitcom family of 1989 as an idealized snapshot of an unattainable past.

  13. @miyakawaso

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    By 1989, middle-class families living comfortably in a big house in a decent area with only dad working was becoming less common. But between 1950 and 1970, many middle middle-class families in urban areas did have their own homes on just the father's salary. Even then, though, often the initial capital for the house was substantially provided by the grandparents.

  14. @Heavywaterblues

    August 29, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    I think you have a point when you say people take any pessimistic statement at face value because that makes sense to them, yet i think materially there is good reason why people are more pessimistic than before, I don’t think social beliefs like that fall out of the sky

Leave a Reply





This area can contain widgets, menus, shortcodes and custom content. You can manage it from the Customizer, in the Second layer section.

 

 

 

  • play_circle_filled

    92.9 : The Torch

  • play_circle_filled

    AGGRO
    'Til Deaf Do Us Part...

  • play_circle_filled

    SLACK!
    The Music That Made Gen-X

  • play_circle_filled

    KUDZU
    The Northwoods' Alt-Country & Americana

  • play_circle_filled

    BOOZHOO
    Indigenous Radio

  • play_circle_filled

    THE FLOW
    The Northwoods' Hip Hop and R&B

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play