Going Beyond Einstein: Linking Time And Consciousness

I constantly can see precise bits of my own future, actual moments. I can tell almost instantly when a news item will be found out to be wrong, I just know they have got it wrong. My brain can pluck complete new music out of the either. And I think I can lknow future discoveries in physics. So yes precogs do exist.

1:13:00 memory

As an analyst, I have a lifetime or lifetimes work ahead….

❤

A must watch

any process requires time. ex. a caterpillar requires a process to become a moth. it is never instant.

Time isn't relative. Everything exists in the present, imo.

No time! No self! How do you know whats happening?

Love this great long video 🤩 Thanks so much 💪🙏

Ok, if you really want to find out, begin with the substance nigra and understand what happens below 100hz with …

You lost me at 2 Psychologists.

I can make up my own educated guess thanks.

30 years ago 2 psychologists opining would be of little to no value.

That’s still true today, for reasons elucidated around the 12min 20 sec mark.

I woke up with YT playing and hearing talk about precognition. Strange thing.

Wow I'm impressed… thank you 🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏💥💥💥💥💥

NO FOLOW UP ON THE BLIND GUYCAN SEE!?

It is interesting when in a deep state of sleep, while dreaming, a person can experience a whole drama that lasts from morning until night, but within the span of one clock hour. So a person can fall asleep, let’s say at 4AM, dream for one hour, but in that one hour dream state, have lived an entire day. Fascinating how our minds do that.

Personally fasting has helped me reach this point of feeling one with all there is. Colors are more vivid. Life is more vivid. For me this starts after 48 hours of fasting. Food can ground us too much. For those who live in the U.S. notice how bread (wheat gluten) affects your brain, mood and body. Food creates mood. Celery and cucumber juice does wonders and is easy to make. Place celery and cucumber in a blender with water and some lemon juice with a little sea salt. It’s rejuvinating. No need to have a juicer. A blender will work.

any research on near death experience and time consciousness. This relates to flashbacks of the past in 3 seconds – feeling like i re-lived my entire life (complete playback) in the moment

TIME AND MIND RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS,CHRONON FIELD THEORY ALL SUPPORT THE 5TH DIMMENSION ,THERES A 7TH AND 10TH OF HIGHER CONSCIOUSNESS

To wake up in the middle of this conference after a serie of weird events is very unsetling, id definitly say positive tho.
i'm far from being smart enough to understand the exact scientific sayings and i dont know what conclusion to draw but this definitly adds up to the " its very hard to believe its real but i cant deny it happened anyway " pile.

Thank you to the scientific community and their hardwork.
And thank you God, for allowing me to live this moment.
(I'll let you define god, i probably wont be able to provide a definition that satisfy everyone anyway, just want to mention its the first time I feel the need to write those 3 words consecutivly )

Warning : Long comment ahead.
‘Information’ ????
What is ‘information’ ? Why don’t we have a clear & rigorous definition of ‘information’ ?
Space & time, matter & energy, information, sentience, thinking & consciousness…..
Most – all ? – serious investigators consider ‘information’ to be one of the fundamental elements of reality, but, again, we don’t have a clear & rigorous definition of the phenomenon.
Most consciousness researchers refer to IIT – integrative information theory – but even within IIT ‘information’ – as a separate & distinct phenomenon in its own right – is not defined with any rigour. Again, it is not defined with a satisfactory amount of verifiable rigour.
‘Thought’, ‘mind’, ‘intelligence’, ‘cognition’ & ‘consciousness’ are all information-related phenomena and it is not difficult to show that one of the principal reasons we have not so far come to any good, proper & fully verifiable understanding of these otherwise greatly sought-after yet still highly mysterious phenomena is due in great part to the simple fact that we do not presently also have a good & proper, fully verifiable understanding of  ‘information’  itself.
Although I have personally had the (dubious) fortune of having been able to figure out ‘information’s’ correct (& fully verifiable) ontological identity – plus a full science of the phenomenon to boot – and although I’m not going to divulge its formalistic definition here in this YouTube comment (without which formalistic definition it is not possible to establish a full & accurate science of the phenomenon, but with it it is) nevertheless I can assure you that with it in hand – that is, with ‘information’s’ correct ontological identity within one’s investigative arsenal (along with a full science thereof also), the exercise of determining the ontological identities (along with an accompanying science of each also) of all of the other directly information-related phenomena such as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, ‘consciousness’ & ‘self-consciousness’ (to far less than exhaust the list) becomes one of no great difficulty.
A full science of any one particular phenomenon will include the phenomenon’s exact specifications, quantifications & understandings of such things as it’s : nature (its ontological identity); its standing (in the existential hierarchy); its role; function; varieties; distribution; incidences; properties/extensions/capacities/capabilities; usages; handling- &/or operational amenabilities & its typical life history (its creation through to its dissolution/erasure).
Once ‘information’s’ correct ontological identity is recognised & understood, no especial difficulty attends the task of determining a full science of the phenomenon. Repeat, no especial difficulty attends the task of determining its nature, standing, role, function, varieties, distribution, incidences, properties/extensions/capacities/capabilities, usages, handling- &/or operational amenabilities, & its typical life history (its creation through to its dissolution/erasure).
‘Handling & operational amenabilities’ ? ‘Information’ can be subject to a particularly large & highly varied kind & amount of safe/non-destructive ‘handling & operational procedures & processes’, & which particular procedures & processes can be performed on any kind & amount of ‘information’ within a very numerically large & highly varied kind of mechanisms, machines, systems, gadgets, contrivances & devices (those both animate & inanimate alike).
Consider how very, very many handling & operational processes & procedures to which (pretty much all) units of information can be safely subject even as the meanings thereof remain un-altered. It – information – can be : copied (onto an almost limitless number of mediums such as light, air, paper, comms screens, neon tubing on billboards & the walls of Times Square, etc, etc); transferred; transported; transmitted; transduced, transformed (into symbols, & then back into analogue or one of its other forms); reflected/bounced; stored; retrieved from storage; sorted/processed; collated; integrated; re-animated back into any other previous form, including its next-to-original state).
Indeed, once both ‘information’s’ correct ontological identity is known along with a full science thereof, much clarifying light is thrown upon essentially all of the other fundamental elements of reality – space, time, matter, energy, charge, etc, etc.
Nevertheless, again, & however surprising – given that we live smack bang right in the middle of ‘the information age’ – the simple, easily verified fact of the matter is, nowhere within the annals of the entire compendium of human discourse, is ‘information’ defined with any scientific/mathematical rigour at all – let alone with sufficient rigour as would allow it to be included in any properly scientific – or mathematical, or philosophical – research work or project.
‘Movies’ ? Movie making & showing – from cameras to screens & projectors – is a classic & extremely common instance of ‘handling’ & subjecting common, everyday pictographic & acoustic information to a not-small number of handling operations. Movies are composed of information – of pictographic & acoustic information – of first captured in cameras, stored & then eventually replayed through a projector, pictographic & acoustic information. Yet, just as the individual units of the pictographic & acoustic information making up the content of any movie get shunted through any of the movie-making-&-showing machinery & process (from movie set to big screen), can be readily identified, observed, followed & understood, so too can all of the individual units of all of the different kinds of information wherever & whenever they exist here in our Universe, including whatever particular processes & operations under which they may be being subject, not omitting any units of information going through our own brains – they can all be identified, classified, tracked-&-traced & understood also. Once ‘information’s’ correct ontological identity is known & understood.
Indeed, it becomes no more difficult to identify, track-&-trace, classify & understand any information being shuttled & operated on inside our own brains than is the task of identifying & tracking-&-tracing water through a water mill, or electricity through a city or nutrients through their respective metabolic pathways, & which particular tracking-&-tracing task also includes that of determining both the locations & the functioning of all of the critical, non-informational (mechanical) processorial & operational components within these systems.
Indeed again ! The task of identifying, tracing-&-tracking information anywhere at any time under any circumstances, including through our own brains, is no more difficult than identifying, tracing-&-tracking the computing processes & algorithmic operations being performed on the bits, bytes & digits churning through a computer.
Nevertheless, this task of identifying, tracking-&-tracing & understanding information where- & whenever any of it exists here in our Universe, becomes as unproblematic as it ultimately proves itself to be only after ‘information’s’ correct identity is known & understood – including the facts that ‘information’ is not computer digits, & computing is not thinking.
Indeed, on only slightly closer inspection computers turn out to be nothing more than up-scaled, turbo charged, electronically automated abacuses, quite literally simple beads-on-strings counting devices – & as such can no more think, learn, understand & be conscious – let alone do so intelligently – than can a school child’s ’times table’, a farmer’s almanac, a mathematician’s log tables or a technician’s slide rule. Or a kindergartener’s set of coloured beads-on-strings.
Furthermore, identifying, tracking-&-tracing the movement of all of the streams of information which eventually make up the content of our own consciousness, enables the exact location of the latter to be determined, & which Mark Solms has already determined as being within the periaqueductal gray region of the brain stem ….
Indeed, examining the particular function of the particular component of our brain which exists at this particular ’Mark Solms spot’ further allows a determination of exactly what consciousness itself is – as a phenomenon in its own right – to be made…….
‘Information’ is real, it can be distinguished from ‘space’ & ‘time’ & ‘matter’ & ‘energy’ & from ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘intelligence’ & ‘consciousness’, it can be identified, observed, measured, tracked-&-traced. And understood.
Go do it ! And absolutely cease failing to include it in all studies of, well, of anything & everything …..including any & all ‘consciousness’ studies.
Cheers

This is Gold

Ask yourself the question: can you define the nowness in a time unit?
Brain starts to melt if you think of it.

2:43:04 i really liked the tupperware presentation. Of course some will not see the math in it, among other things. Very interesting and agree on collaboration. Unfortunate the communication protocol has not made any strategic changes. The past has proven repeatedly what happens by waiting.

This is unbelievable they just make stuff up it appears they just whatever comes in their mind they just make it up it's unbelievable

I believe we can teach this much quicker just by step by step use your own this is easy TRUTH be told but how to understanding what you seeing with logic then communication for me this done through my vision which I place in your mind then started have a go when your able to see actually this more relevant than time