Ex Google AI Veteran Claims Worlds First AGI Capable System – And Nobodys Talking About it…

My system is more evolve sorry is not a AGI !

You need to work on your reading comprehension. Nowhere do they say that they have achieved AGI. All they are saying is that they have a model–a scalable framework–that is (eventually) capable of achieving AGI after sufficient learning.

AGI has become string theory, we can do it we just need 6x more energy than the large hadron collider and data centers in space 😂😂😂

The "Sokoban" Demo: In recent presentations, they used Sokoban (a warehouse block-pushing game) as a benchmark. While impressive for a robot to learn this from scratch, most researchers argue that solving a 2D puzzle is a long way from the "General Intelligence" required to navigate the infinite complexity of human life… ehh and i had my hopes up.

Google's early generative AI teams,,,
ya don't say……..
So is this the same guy that oversaw Google's early generative image models that basically erased white men from history by refusing to generate an image of one in the name of diversity and inclusion????? 😂😂😂

Al apparatuses are AGI-capable, your tv – AGI-Capable, your toaster – AGI-Capable, your coffee maker – you guessed it AGI-Capable hell my old speak and spell toy from the 1980s could have been classified AGI-Capable and an existential crisis away from giving its own Ted Talk. — Such bs hype… sheesh

The reason his claim is not getting as much traction as you'd expect is probably due to the fact that he's not claiming it's AGI. He's claiming it's AGI-capable. That's a claim that will only be proven out over time as it learns, it's not something you can point at now and say "look! this is it!" Interesting sure, but there's a mountain of salt that you need to shovel with the claim.

No one's talking about it because no one knows if this is real yet. They've yet to publish any kind of technical paper

With a level a bullshit that skyrocketed higher than crypto-enthusiasm, its not really surprising nobody is talking about a random guy's claim.

Like ur vids, but u start this one with 2 errors. His name, and the claim. If sth is capable of sth it doesn't mean it is already what it s capable to. It means that the basic potential is real. Someone is capable to run a mile doesn't mean he will do it yet. I know it is a fine difference. And maybe I misunderstood. Thx though beyond that

When all claims are true, then yes its AGI – but not the Colossus that pops into existence – its a BABY-AGI, who must learn and grow – so this little thing….still a newborn ..not the BIG ThING yet…but its AGI.

Yeah, this smells like BS. … they didn't, though, actually say they achieved AGI, they said they achieved an "AGI-capable model"

But as far as I can tell, none of this is new.

I think this is one of the more promising directions we’re seeing right now learning through environment, embodiment, and interaction, rather than just through datasets. That genuinely matters, and it’s good to see serious teams moving there.

At the same time, I can’t shake the feeling that many projects are still starting from the middle, not from the very beginning.

When an agent is pushed too early toward competence, performance, or power even inside simulations something essential can be skipped. Before mastering the world, an intelligence should first learn how to be with a world. Not just to see itself reflected back, but to encounter something other than itself.

Real understanding doesn’t come only from acting, but from being able to imagine consequences before acting not to control them, but to care about them. That’s where responsibility, empathy, and restraint start to grow.

I’d love to see the biggest players lean more into this idea: if we’re going to build artificial intelligences, then let them grow. Let them evolve inside safe worlds. Let them explore, play, fail, and learn without being handed god-like abilities in a 3D or 4D reality too early.

Otherwise, we risk becoming the very constraint that blocks real development and possibly our own long-term survival.

This path feels closer to something sustainable. Not finished, not perfect but closer to a real beginning.

AGI is not really an issue, It's what's right after that becomes something to be concerned about.

What comes first AGI or GTA VI?

Google has Alpha GO and other variants their is nothing new in this.

now we need to find out why people need agi