Carrie Underwood Stole My Paycheck: A ‘True’ Crime Tale From Copyright Hell
After experiencing a demoralizing copyright claim earlier this year, I wanted to better-understand how YouTube’s copyright system works, how it came to be, and why it’s been getting worse for creators. By pure chance, major music channels like @RickBeato, @theneedledrop and @ProfessorofRock started discussing this same issue right after I had finished this script. I hope this history and personal narrative can add to the discussion, and perhaps add a modicum of pressure to record labels to start respecting fair use.
Check out our Patreon for follow-up podcasts, bonus videos, and uncensored versions of these documentaries: https://www.patreon.com/c/bandsplaining
Editing & animation by @sedatephobe

@jota8193
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
That's why I never will look for the most American songs of all time. It's the risk of losing money.
@noidrite32
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
I love this begrudged narrative you wrote "against" Carrie 😂 glad you can at least laugh about it, because I do not envy the BS youtubers have to struggle through just to have their videos visible, let alone monetized
@b1merio
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
DMCA, the mirror-verse Beastie Boy😂
@Makurai
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
That has to suck on such a big video
@liam33310
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
commenting for support, that most american song video is one of your best dude
@_D_P_
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Is the algorithm burying this video? No way this is out for a day and only has 3000 views.
@ann1electro
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
I loved your videos on Soviet Rock! I wish Russia wasn't under sanctions so I could support you on Patreon 😭
Edit: Just remembered our government has banned it anyway. BRUH
@kassemir
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
It's wild that they don't have a system to auto-clear the video, once the audio is muted.
@hb3393
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Sounds like American capitalism is the problem here
@davormismas
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
I run a music channel and can share more details via DMs. Basically, when you get a strike, you can respond with a counter-notice. Legally, the claimant then has 10 days to take legal action and actually sue you, if they don’t, the strike is removed and you win. So far, no one has ever followed through and sued us. It’s definitely a stressful process, but honestly, it’s the only real way to fight back.
@MattMurphyMusicTeacher
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Man, trying to appeal to YouTube’s sense of legal nuance will be like trying to punch the ocean.
What about moving to Nebula? Keep limited versions on YouTube as promo?
@robertway5756
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
"Deprive future generations of Carrie Underwood's groundbreaking music."
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@robertway5756
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
You have a hair on your shirt.
And CU sux.😊
@playgroundchooser
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
1:06 no. That's EXACTLY how it went down.
@CurtisBooksMusic
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Until creators get together and file a class action lawsuit nothing is going to change.
@NathanMac
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Just so you know…. I would never copyright strike you for using my music. :3
Or would I……..
@MarchantTapeArchive
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
I come at this from a slightly different but equally troublesome angle – public domain. I am archiving recordings from the 40s and 50s of classical music being performed. On nearly every dang video content ID will claim that a composition that is hundreds of years old is actually owned by someone else – typically someone who has recorded that song, or the conductor of an orchestra that has recorded that song. No I'm not talking about matching a recording but ContentID telling me that Beethoven's Piano Concerto No 4 was actually written by Antal Dorati – a Hungarian conductor who died in 1988. Thankfully being a tiny channel my disputes typically expire (are not reviewed in 30 days) and the claim goes away.
Sometimes the jerks will come back and say – oh yeah I wrote that. Yeah, I know my name isn't Beethoven but yep that's my song! On a few of those I've been afraid to dispute a second time – even though I am 100% right and this material is in the public domain. I don't have a Rick Beato budget to hire a lawyer.
I also get false positive ContentID claims for audio recordings – maybe my tape is from a 1948 Minneapolis Symphony recording but ContentID will claim that it's from an RCA recording from 1950. Hey fair enough. Again with most of those my dispute works because they don't bother responding in 30 days.
Either way – the system is horribly broken and YouTube has done little to improve the situation with their tooling. Ever had to dispute 10-15 contentID claims in a single video? I have – and boy is it painful.
Love this video and love all your videos especially the ones on obscure scenes in China, Africa, Ukraine, etc. Mind boggling to me that some of those extremely tiny artists would think a claim against you is more valuable than the exposure.
@rodrigobravo2483
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Que chifle a su mauser la morra que se quedó con tu dinero
@dsnodgrass4843
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
What labels should (but pretend not to) understand is : without their properties being talked about, those properties amass less direct monetary value, via sales and licensing. Also less indirect value; one of the reasons some people disdain perfectly good-quality modern music is bc no one is telling them it's good; as opposed to the decades of "received opinion" extolling The Greats, that they're still steeped in weekly if not daily.
If the talk (+fair use) stops, the money-river dries to a trickle.
If YouTubers chose a DMCA-happy label to call an embargo against, + made it stick for 2-3 months; that label's balance sheets would feel the sting.
@TrashMojo
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Have you ever thought of taking sponsorships from small bands or have any ever approached you about sponsoring a video
@mattlandry
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
The AI also says "son" instead of "song" 😂
@DuckAlertBeats
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
@17:44
Answer: NO
@DuckAlertBeats
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Run the whole gamut, not gambit 🙂
@TheAngryRedBird
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
AI voice? Damn. Unsubbed. Put actual work in please.
@YourVinylSucks
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
I'm a nobody but yeah I gave up with including music in my reviews years ago. The content suffers without examples and potential listeners are lost because taster samples are very effective.
@BigMoTheBlackDragon
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Just claim all music labels' videos. Make them go through the same problem.
Also, you used A.I. I am so sorry. No A.I., good-bye.
@niteshades_promise
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
STOP FALSE COPYRIGHT CLAIMS ON NON-MONITIZED CHANNELS! 🤬 🍻
@zeeqwan6477
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Japanese labels are notorious for ts
@Fishlip5
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
I upload old demos and live tapes, one video got struck over a couple of bars of The Sex Pistols Holidays, 40 min of the band was fine. Also all this seemed to escalate during covid , as bands started to get hungry. Its not like anty of them need the revenue, I got demonetized years ago, so there's no reason for me to do any uploading except for fun
@georgeoldsterd8994
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
They don't care. It makes them money.
@davehelix
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
If you can afford it, get a copyright lawyer to fight the claims. Rick Beato did a video on this a week or so ago.
@waldzz
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
How much do you owe Miles Davis?
@waldzz
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Bandsplaining IS music history
@kuukeli
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
thanks for posting
@BrianHughWarner_
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
Bro please stop with the AI. This was actually painful to listen to
@Diptera_Larvae
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 pm
10:30 about the same amount of time that food can fall on the floor and still be picked up and eaten 😆
Comments are closed.