The Resource Curse, or Who Owns Natural Resources? – Philosophy Tube
Who do natural resources belong to? Why are many resource-rich countries so poor and what can we do about it? Watch and find out!
Politics Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvoAL-KSZ32fs6KX9IqqZY_0D4YXggcBN
Subscribe! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thephilosophytube
Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/PhilosophyTube
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosophyTube?ref=hl
Twitter: @PhilosophyTube
Email: ollysphilosophychannel@gmail.com
Google+: google.com/+thephilosophytube
Suggested Reading:
Leif Wenar, “Property Rights and the Resource Curse” http://tinyurl.com/q5jxnpo
Thomas Pogge, “World Poverty and Human Rights”
If you or your organisation would like to financially support Philosophy Tube in distributing philosophical knowledge to those who might not otherwise have access to it in exchange for credits on the show, please get in touch!
Music: ‘Show your Moves,’ ‘Pamgea’ and ‘Hyperfun’ by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Any copyrighted material should fall under fair use for educational purposes or commentary, but if you are a copyright holder and believe your material has been used unfairly please get in touch with us and we will be happy to discuss it.
@andrewharrison8436
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Ouch… this one hurts.
I can't see any moral solution being implemented in practice. Still step 1 is identifying the problem.
See also "Dutch disease" in economics.
@dawnmoore9122
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Resources belong to the working class worldwide but as long as we live under capitalism, the idea of the UK etc. just buying products with high tariffs from countries that would buy the resources from dictators, then giving the money back, sounds better than not having a helpful system in place.
@someones5551
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
How about no
@ElementalofAir
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
You could say that the natural resources are a feature of the land in which they are acquired, be it through mining, logging, drilling, or any other form of excavation. At that point, the question is to whom the land belongs.
One could argue that it belongs to the government or the people or nobody at all. I would say it belongs to the nebulous object that is the country, which is represented by a government that runs in accordance to the wills of the people that inhabit it and to the betterment of said country, thereby becoming the anthropomorphized version of the country as a whole.
If the government does not represent the will of its people, especially if it is doing so via crimes, it also is not an avatar for the country. Until the correct form of government is established, the country is 'dead', lacking a mouth to communicate, nor hands with which to work, nor legs to visit foreign dignitaries. A ghost that can only watch its house being burglarized.
The reason I come to such a conclusion is because I feel this best explains the trepidation around the idea of someone invading and absconding with anything within the nation. But individuals, although a part of the people, cannot individually sell off these resources in most cases. At most, they'd be compensated if the resources were on land that they owned. And buying from a dictator would only encourage violence and domination for profit, which would be detrimental to all people as time goes on.
Therefore, if it does belong to someone, meaning it can be stolen, but not by the government nor by the people, the only option left is the country, an entity referred to as an individual and recognized as such around the world. The country does not lose its identity when the person in government changes, nor when immigrants arrive. Therefore, a government who is supported by the people and runs to meet their country's needs would be the only avatars available to sell off its property.
@besacciaesteban
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
The sad truth is that it doesn't matter if his approach to the problem would work, because it won't be put into practice.
@nobody8328
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Hello Abby! 🥰
@mishapurser4439
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
You could also say that natural resources belong to the proletariat class that cultivates or extracts it.
@mishapurser4439
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
The 'International Resource Privilege' is just a guise and dogwhistle for post-colonial imperialism via corporations. Democratic leaders trying to uphold the rights of their people have been murdered with the aid of Western intelligence services to this end.
@bvegannow1936
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Natural resources belong to everyone or no one.
Convince gov to let everyone use an acre of free tax free good land to live on and grow food on
End farm subsidies
@danielrhouck
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
6:36 Are you saying that if Teodoro Obiang, incumbent president of Equatorial Guinea, wanted to listen to you talk about philosophy and politics, you wouldn’t let him?
@nick.culver
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
I think the issue will become a gradient if sorts where you have to decide which governments sufficiently represent the people. Does the US government currently represent the interests of its people? Trump wasn't even elected with a majority of the vote, and large companies seem to do as they please with our natural resources without much ability for an average citizen to control their use. I think it's a legitimate question as to if the American gov truly represents the will of its people.
Another problem will be picking a time at which to start the clock of who's land and resources are who's. Many political boundaries are less than 100-200 years old. Can you buy things made of resources from the United States without it being theft from the Native American peoples?
Effective control will always be the situation because trying to figure out if a government sufficiently represents its people is extremely tough, and borders are fluid through history.
It's a tough question that could work with small countries but would be tough for places like China. The Chinese government doesn't represent it's people and this is essentially advocating not trading with China. I'm not sure that's currently sustainable.
@frankpinaresgutierrez5971
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Oh boy, things have changed so much.
@littledisneygoddess
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
3:05 Oh, Canada?
@tracyhobo9718
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
we are all missing out on money,we should be geting profit but our gov keep it
@Rolatii
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
WHO IS THIS CHILD?!
@yansakuya1
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Power, who or what ever has the most power in the region is the owner of those resources, as isn't that what always boil down to since the very beginning of humanity?
@caseymilledge1559
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Should governments be moral?
@1TmW1
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
If no one owns natural resources, then you could just charge for extraction cost.
@eyeonfreedomsite1233
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Thomas Paine had a very unique solution… "Agrarian Justice is the title of a pamphlet written by Paine and published in 1797, which proposed that those who possess cultivated land owe the community a ground rent…" Wikipedia
@kindoflame
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
A very similar concept in economics is the Paradox of Plenty. Economic theory predicts that countries with large amounts of national resources will have large amounts of capital; many countries in the Southern Hemisphere are counterexamples to this. One answer to this is that these countries do have a large amount of capital, although it is not evenly distributed within the country itself. In other words, Mr. Obiang is as rich as the people of Equitorial Guinea are collectively poor. The problem with this answer is that it begs the question of how such an extreme inequality be formed and maintained, which is a whole 'nother branch of economics that is as difficult is it is controversial.
@grim5i
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Natural resources are not the source of a nations wealth. Nations are wealthy if their people are productive. The reason for the resource curse is not that the dictator isn't sharing the wealth, it's that he can enable the people to be unproductive by paying them off with oil money. The path to success for ambitious people in a resource cursed nation lies in appeasing the dictator and not in being productive on your own. In fact, the dictator has an incentive to prevent other sectors of the economy from gaining clout because they are a threat to his power. The people of resource cursed nations could still independently pursue the kind of wealth posessed by their non-cursed neighbours, but they don't. Why they don't is what you'll need to explain to understand the resource curse.
@henrykarrowkamara9958
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Omg
@Eltipoquevisteayer
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
Your face signs are unsettling, 1 sec in and you seem so smug is annoying
@palomairiel2635
April 1, 2026 at 4:55 am
estoy viendo este video para una tarea, y me choca que hable tan rápido y sin subtítulos en inglés si quieraaaaaa, ya me quiero morir :c
Comments are closed.