menu Home chevron_right
NEWS & CULTURE

The big problem with how we pick juries

Vox | January 16, 2026



A legal loophole makes juries less diverse.

Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO

Four years after the shooting death of Laquan McDonald, the police officer, Jason Van Dyke, faced his day in court. But in a trial where race became central to the case, there’s only one black person on the jury. And that’s in a county where nearly a quarter of people are black. How did this happen?

In jury selection, racial discrimination has historically been tricky. Discrimination isn’t allowed in jury selection, thanks to what’s called a “Batson challenge.” But the problem is — Batson has been widely regarded as a failure at keeping racism out of the jury box. Watch the video above to find out why that is, and why it complicates the prospect of a fair trial by jury.

Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what’s really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.

Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H

Written by Vox

Comments

This post currently has 29 comments.

  1. @Shioyi

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    Erhm ok.., bro was running around in the street holding a knife ready like that, absolutely NOT surprised he got shot lol what did yall expect

  2. @JS-xu1so

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    this is just more racially tangled bullsh. we cant strike jurors because of race but we should select them because of race. race matters when selecting jurors but we should "judge a person by their character not their race." select jurors by their character. also there is more to who my peers are than just race.

  3. @andrewhall7930

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    The roots of our (criminal) legal system is 75% British, 12% French, 3% Latin and 10% uniquely American. If you research the similarities between the USA and Britain its pretty staggering. Try it sometime

  4. @BeWithTamia

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    This is a real problem. I’ve only seen in my 25 years of living one family member get picked for Jury Duty. My mother is in her 40s and has yet to be picked at all.

  5. @TheHorrorDevotee

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    In the UK, we don't even typical voir dire jurors. Once you're summoned, 16 members of the pool are randomly selected for a trial and then the clerk reads off 12 names to go sit in the box. The only time jurors are challenged is if the defendant, prosecution, or one of the witnesses recognises one of you.

  6. @jekw23

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    I was on a three month trial, multiple attempted murder charges.

    The scariest part to me was the other jurors. The amount of hubris, ignorance and entitlement was astounding. Some had made their decision before the end of the opening statements. Trey were all over the place but always 100% sure they were right even after changing their mind multiple times.

    I’ll never want to go in front of a jury.

  7. @aaausername

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    Why do they sometimes pick juries from lists of licensed drivers? That's leaving out a lot of people that otherwise would be able to serve on the jury but just don't drive.

  8. @agoodspeler5457

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    Why do you use fictional examples to illustrate your non-fictional statements? Like using clips from The Devil's Advocate and How To Get Away With Murder. Fiction literally didn't happen, and is stained by the biases of its creator. Fiction may have some elements based on non-fiction, and it can be based on a true story, but that still begs the question, why not use the real story it's based on then? Citing fiction doesn't strengthen your arguments.

  9. @Greatcountry37

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    I want to know: there's a big focus on black people being underrepresented in this video, but has there been any studies in how likely racial groups are to skip jury duty?

  10. @normbograham3

    January 16, 2026 at 11:16 am

    We are in a day and age, where in lots of states, your voter registration is not private information. So, the judges can try to skew the jury, to have only republicans, or only democrats. We also have a problem with paying jurors. To be fair, they need to be paid $100/day. there is no way any working person, can pay their bills with less.

Comments are closed.




This area can contain widgets, menus, shortcodes and custom content. You can manage it from the Customizer, in the Second layer section.

 

 

 

  • play_circle_filled

    92.9 : The Torch

  • play_circle_filled

    AGGRO
    'Til Deaf Do Us Part...

  • play_circle_filled

    SLACK!
    The Music That Made Gen-X

  • play_circle_filled

    KUDZU
    The Northwoods' Alt-Country & Americana

  • play_circle_filled

    BOOZHOO
    Indigenous Radio

  • play_circle_filled

    THE FLOW
    The Northwoods' Hip Hop and R&B

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play