THE FATHER OF MEMES: A GUIDE TO RICHARD DAWKINS
Get Surfshark VPN at https://surfshark.deals/sisyphus Enter promo code SISYPHUS for 83% off and 3 extra months for FREE!
PATREON: [
[https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3261155](https://www.youtube.com/redirect?even…)
](
[https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3261155](https://www.youtube.com/redirect?even…)
)
MUSIC: [
[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKPZ…](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKPZ…)
](
[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKPZ…](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKPZ…)
)
TWITTER: [
[https://twitter.com/5isyphus55](https://www.youtube.com/redirect?even…)
](
[https://twitter.com/5isyphus55](https://www.youtube.com/redirect?even…)
)
Sources:
[Richard Dawkins loses ‘humanist of the year’ title over trans comments | Books | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/apr/20/richard-dawkins-loses-humanist-of-the-year-trans-comments)
[Richard Dawkins event cancelled over his ‘abusive speech against Islam’ | Science and nature books | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jul/24/richard-dawkins-event-cancelled-over-his-abusive-speech-against-islam)
[Spectrum of theistic probability – Wikiwand](https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Spectrum_of_theistic_probability)
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/09/is-richard-dawkins-destroying-his-reputation
The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1976. ISBN 978-0-19-286092-7.
The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1982. ISBN 978-0-19-288051-2.
The Blind Watchmaker. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 1986. ISBN 978-0-393-31570-7.
The God Delusion. Bantam Press (United Kingdom), Houghton Mifflin (United States). 2006. ISBN 978-0-618-68000-9.

@v4vinaceous
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
A very prejudiced interpretation of Dawkins' thoughts
@daseinz
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Funniest part is his recent interview where he says that he misses the Christian Europe. Because other religions are being held in UK. He's a special type of loser.
@alexluna3207
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
I digress his viewpoints on the topics are not "shallow" nor "archaic" but well thought out and backed by actual EVIDENCE, which is of utmost importance when proving something is right or wrong regardless of whether its emotionally uncomfortable for some or that the idea is put out recently and believed by a more contemporary audience does nothing to back it up as a true statement what matters and what he does do is look to the EVIDENCE and cites it in backing his claims constantly , other than that entertaining video.
@ArranVid
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Richard Dawkins is right when it comes to the trans issue. He knows the science.
@BayAreaMike99
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
In the whole 11:31 I clearly don’t know what you were talking about😂
@Maxxxed-Out
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
What’s wrong with facts?
@edwardrodriguez3937
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Dawkins can do no wrong! 😊
@jimtomo2025
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
He is right about gender identity tho
@Ihatemyusernamemore
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Dicky D aka Richard Dawkins is the man, idgaf what anyone says, he's a legend.
@Victor_Andrei
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
"Biologist under fire for views on gender identity" ain't that a headline?
@thejoker7902
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Can ANYBODY even explain what is wrong with his tweets?
Everything he said in these tweets is true.
@B1G_GUY__
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
“Now there’s a pretty transphobe, exquisite!”
@jay-ki6ie
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
11:13 all these tweets are based
@markmerzweiler832
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Dawkins's "Selfish Gene" = Schoepenhaur's "The Will." Arthur just wrote it over 150 years earlier.
@friedrichnietzsche7376
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Do a video on matt dillahunty.
@cygneturesounds
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
I had to pause a re-read the tweet (being up too fast to read and assuming it was a really spicy take)… it was not spicy at all. I'm assuming it was sarcasm that he lost his humanity award?
@johanliebert6000
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
this video has been criticised for implying that dawkins' is wrong for his tweets without any evidence/arguments
@flipper6582
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
this guy scratches such a specific and amazing itch no one else has or can and i love it
@ricksanchez9669
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
7:31 parasite*
@tribudeuno
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
“What is the source of all this trouble? I'm saying that the source is basically in thought. Many people would think that such a statement is crazy, because thought is the one thing we have with which to solve our problems. That's part of our tradition. Yet it looks as if the thing we use to solve our problems with is the source of our problems. It's like going to the doctor and having him make you ill. In fact, in 20% of medical cases we do apparently have that going on. But in the case of thought, it's far over 20%.
…the general tacit assumption in thought is that it's just telling you the way things are and that it's not doing anything – that 'you' are inside there, deciding what to do with the information. But you don't decide what to do with the information. Thought runs you. Thought, however, gives false information that you are running it, that you are the one who controls thought. Whereas actually thought is the one which controls each one of us.
Thought is creating divisions out of itself and then saying that they are there naturally. This is another major feature of thought: Thought doesn't know it is doing something and then it struggles against what it is doing. It doesn't want to know that it is doing it. And thought struggles against the results, trying to avoid those unpleasant results while keeping on with that way of thinking. That is what I call "sustained incoherence”…
David Bohm, quantum physicist, unknowingly wrote the final necessary calculations that made the Atomic Bomb possible in his doctoral dissertation that was seized by the US Government
@jronyt4058
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
He's like Neil Degrasee Tyson. They both think that rationalism is the only good thing in the world.
@appleturdpie
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Was there something he said anti-trans before that 2015 tweet? Because there's a 2006 two part episode of South Park that heavily memes on him, the fact it's accurate in regard to his views on trans people makes the episode more hilarious. (For reference it's s10e12 & e13 of the Go God Go episodes)
@weninmical2629
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
To me, the way he advocates for atheism is super cringe, but ig it was cool in 2006 AYEEEE RYHME
@stephano4468
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
I just purchased Susan Blackmores "The Meme Machine" today on a whim and seeing as you've mentioned them in this video a dedicated look into the topic could be highly informative for what I feel is a painfully under highlighted subject and idea
@BlueminNight
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Monsoon view
@sendtome157
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
im pretty sure that tweet about trans women is a post every single one of our uncles has made.
@riper7514
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
that last sentence really did strung a chord in me, thanks
@bugseater1
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
I am transgender and I see his comment about it as a bit iffy but not full blown evil worth total 100% shaming of.
You can't change your chromosomal sex, but you can change several other characteristics of it (hormones, a lot of secondary sexual characteristics, etc.), sex in its totality is not a binary, and a fully transitioned person would fall non-binary in some spots, male in some spots, and female on others.
And also gender is a separate thing from sex (he kind of mentions this), with both a non-deniable biological part to identity (Trans people's brains match closer to their desired sex and lie somewhere between their birth and desired sex), and a socially constructed view of gender (roles, looking deeper into identity, etc. This stuff is literally so weird when you begin to look at it and runs super deep, and as Lily Alexandre put it, "I see this sh-t in six dimensions, you cannot begin to comprehend just how fake it is!").
It's good that as a formality he refers to someone as their gender, rather than biological sex, as anyone should out of respect.
@hosh7150
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
I am wondering what is the difference between "memes", according to the definition of Dawkins, and "archetypes" from Carl Gustav Jung ?
@onlinereal
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
so smoothie if you think its accordingly this way
@onlinereal
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
its a metta bitches
@onlinereal
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
garantie full shittynis included noted
@petrkupec8347
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Hey sir, have you considered making one about Hitchens? Cheers
@ProGremlinPlayer
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
Richard Dawkins indirectly invented Big Chungus
@polarbianarchy3333
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
The god facade is a shared meme that has a continuum of expression across dominance hierarchal cultures or those conquered by cultures of economic dominant drives/memes., the western European patriarchal colonialism.
@AnnaLiisaOG
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
His excuse/joke to not do theological research is terrible though. No one believes in leprechauns but close to half the world believe in God/god and have personal testimony regarding their belief. It's not the same comparison. He shouldn't be so sloppy
@jackhandma1011
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
He maybe an atheist, but when he dies, he'll be surprised to find himself on meme heaven.
@hexa1905
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
He is still the humanist of the year.
He is and will always be until his death one the biggest lgbt defender.
@CynicalSnowflake
November 13, 2025 at 1:12 pm
What is your issue with his tweets that you've shown? Every single one of them is very reasonable.
Comments are closed.