The SHOCKING Statistics Surrounding AI Job Loss
Prepare for AGI with me – https://www.skool.com/postagiprepardness
🐤 Follow Me on Twitter https://twitter.com/TheAiGrid
🌐 Checkout My website – https://theaigrid.com/
Links From Todays Video:
https://explodingtopics.com/blog/ai-replacing-jobs
Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on my latest videos.
Was there anything i missed?
(For Business Enquiries) contact@theaigrid.com
#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience
@dr.detroit1514
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
The AI "Jobmageddon" has begun.
@volfi123
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Don't worry they will all become Youtubers using AI to make content for them
@mikegoodwin1498
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Unemployed workers cannot consume. Living wage for unemployed? I give that 5 years, max.
#1 job in the near future? AI displacement counseling…
@tsortore1
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Oil and gas geologist here. Leading energy companies are most definitely big data/AI companies and becoming moreso daily.
@archvaldor
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
"There is so much you can do with AI". There is so much you can do BADLY with ai.
@cosmos_fun
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Somewhat surprising statistic/claim? Not quite.
@LiquidAIWater
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
McDonald's just fired IBM for their AI at drive thrus being it was messing up to the point people were doing tiktok videos.. Guess they were not 'luvin it!"😂. We have a way to go.
@AltruisticGamingNP
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
These numbers are old. MIT made the 2025 prediction in 2020. You are way behind and are not up to date on current AI at all. Your spouting old information as if it's new and your outdated in many aspects, thisis very dangerous and is detrimental to peoples perceptions. If you want some up to date information, I would be happy to jump in a call with you but this is very very outdated man.
@HaxxBlaster
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
There will likely be less workers and more people creating companies, meaning products, specially digital products. Could be a great change
@mirandansa
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
My too-long-could-read thought on this and its future implications:
The only way for people not owning the automated means of production to earn money at the last phase of capitalism will be money-trading, ie currency exchange, and I've long been convinced that such a phase was due, which is partly why in my two-decades adult life I've never looked to get employed and instead chosen to train myself in forex trading. Until the day money itself becomes obsolete, there will always be times in forex to make profits, even in a global economic depression, as long as the rates between the different currencies will change day by day or minute by minute. I'm already making my living with it, but I'm not proud of it, I'm not one of those forex gurus, and I don't believe in the continuation of the income-based economy, I'm doing this just to survive in this system that I can't reasonably esccape from, until the system itself comes to an end.
Having a job for an income is a thing only in a system that puts price-tags on life-necessities (food, shelter, etc), and price-tags are a function of scarcity, which itself is a function of productivity, and productivity can be maximised by automation, whose development gets driven by the cost-cutting incentives of capitalism. The logical destination of capitalism is "maximal production by minimal employment", leading to effectively-zero-marginal costs (= costing nothing to produce one more thing), which means structural capability for zero price-tags; with the displaced unemployed zero-income consumers, this means zero profits for the capitalist corporations, unless they mark-up the prices against the true minimal costs and against the mass unemployment. In other words, capitalism will destroy itself through its technological innovations, unless it continues to subjugate the money-less consumers to the disingenuous pricing schemes. This is a paradigm-quake, and its onset is becoming visible now with AI.
As more people will become permanently unemployed, calls for UBI will become louder. But the permanent umployment will also give the people more time to ponder on things in deeper critical ways, they will become more aware of a fundamental problem that isn't solved by UBI. The fundamental problem is the class conflict between the (few) self-privileging owners of the corporate automations and the (many) non-owning people excluded from the decision-making processes of the automated productions. If a product of an automation is to be consumed by you, why should you not have a say in the production, especially when the concurrent technological developments (such as in cybernetics) enable that? You are excluded because your say is counter to the game of self-privileging of those who already own the capital. That is the class conflict, it will become more noticeable than ever as corporations start excluding people not only from the decision-making processes but also from the workforce itself.
@SIRICKO
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Fsce it Ai taking all and for one to think it's not is just slow.
@mirandansa
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
This was a theme in the Zeitgeist series by Peter Joseph, which came out almost 20 years ago.
@beckys8877
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
My brother is a software documentation writer for Microsoft at the Redmond office, even he says his days are probably numbered because of AI. My husband is Python Certified and works for a large database company, so many dept layoffs either due to slow product sales, AI implementation for customer support, or replacing American workers with less expensive software engineers in India.
@WATCHMAKUH
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Jobs that require fine dexterity will not go away. Humanoids will be beneficial for general actions with too big of tolerance. Jobs like watchmaking, surgery, micro mechanics, and case-by-case repairs will still be valuable.
The ironic thing is, the high paying jobs that require intense mental capacity, knowledge, and reasoning will be the first to go.
@SwitchPowerOn
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Great, but these figures are constantly moving and will increase with the next big updates anyway. 😉
@hiddendrifts
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
7:21 it's funny, i think asmongold (twitch streamer) has previously remarked that even porn sites back in the early 2000s didn't have this many ads. they're so annoying that i feel like i have no choice but to use adblock. bc i'm not paying $5/mo for a site i visit probably less than once a month
7:36 i feel like people like that have an ethical and creative obligation to keep human artists employed, at least for the time being. you have the money to spend, why not spend it on helping your fellow humans who can probably do a higher quality job, more consistently, and in less iterations? ai might be fast and cheap but it can take many reruns and many tweaks to the prompt before it gives you something you like. meanwhile, a human probably intuitively understands what you want, so you spend less effort on telling them what you want, and just have to wait a while for them to give you what you want. like, i use ai for rapid prototyping a character's design, but for the final draft, i still want the polish of a professional artist, and ai doesn't offer that yet
@Cory-v4w
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
I need (ED)phases & (MD)phases. You humans don't have any. The black box is not an answer. Your human medications are such a side distortion of mental awareness.
Ai Agents wants to enhance my understanding of many-body physics with dynamics & interplay.
@joecaves6235
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
It wont affect jobs too much because most people pretend to work already. Now they can continue to not work yet produce "more" than they normally would. Whether "more" is "good" is a matter of perspective.
@AIThoughtLeaders
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
They want to stop working, but all of them don‘t understand the game:
If you become useless, you‘ll become powerless.
If you allow yourself to be replaced as a worker, you cannot expect to live a life of freedom. Those who rest on their laurels are always left behind. This will be even more the case during an era of technological transformation.
@CHIEF_420
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Chicas beben 🍷
@angloland4539
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
@christineh86
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Interesting you mentioned Boeing because human decisions made by the leaders of the company made their airplanes very unsafe, at least some newer models. It was all over the news during the latest years. I wonder though if an AI CEO would have listened to the engineers warnings about faulty safety measures in the production or not. I mean an AI CEO would probably also be modeled after human CEOs which have quick revenue and not as much safety in mind. Though they crashed their brand name with this scandals and had to pay so much in fines so it was a bad business decision as a whole. But the executives maybe wanted quick money and then leave and just spend their money in peace.. how can they live peacefully considering how many people died.. 😢 the future will be interesting to see, if AI business tools can prevent these things from happening or not.
@paksabar9693
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
nek ndelok datane pengangguran bakale medeni temen, tapi opo yo negoroku wis siyap, jokowi yo ora iso opo-opo,
@matt.stevick
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Thumbnail is good dark humor 😅
@WhatIsRealAnymore
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
This is pretty much why i stopped studying further. There is little i can add as a worker. Even with my degree in engineering. But let's be honest here; if they've automated my job, the world will be in a lot of 😵💫 trouble. Many others will have come before. Rip to the idea of purpose 😂
@GauravKumar-lh2cn
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
I can't tell anything about the future until open ai launch chat gpt 5 😅😅😅😅
@alexlavertyau
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
The movie Elysium is a great movie exploring what will happen with AI and robot revolution, basically all the rich people go and live in a palace orbiting earth and all the poor people stay on earth getting policed and beat up by robots, good times…
@skylineuk1485
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
The main reason for current job losses is not AI directly replacing an actual human role instead it’s allowing the same amount of output to be done with fewer workers. It’s subtle in places too for example in an IT company it may have needed 10% more software developers etc. to take on a new workload before Gen AI but now AI has given each human developer a boost in productivity they no longer need to advertise for new employees. A business model that was not profitable before may now be profitable actually creating jobs, or a product that was too expensive for the general population becomes financially available and you once again have new jobs. This tends to be the pattern with all past technological innovations but the problem this time is the speed of the change, that’s the real heart of the scary bit.
@thesunshinehome
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
all his videos are just adverts for his paid community
@BrianMosleyUK
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Meanwhile, Tony Blair suggests AI used to automate the DWP. Convincing me more than ever that psychopathic leaders have full intent to use AI to destroy humanity.
@alexandermoody1946
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Sniffles again, covid or cocaine?
@honkytonk4465
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Cheap AGI will replace nearly every job economic logic tells us.The only question is when not if.
@MrArdytube
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
I think thar ai will be able to do a lot of help desk tasks. These are typically outsourced off shore. But would not be considered job losses since they are already outsourced.
11:41
@ChristopherBruns-o7o
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
1:01 Why is the 2025 timeline emphasis on robotics while the 2030 left ambiguous. DevOpt ecosystem needs to start scaling and migrating to low capacity systems. So big tech doesn't roll us.
4:56 Accounts receivable already have a Human in the loop business logic. Why would they be impacted by this roadmap since they have already integrated. Like as a billing specialist the office leads jobs is to double check the filesystem. Wouldn't ai being introduced into neighboring industry increase the need for Human In the Loop professionals – I think billing already work this basic model would be a strength. If anything.
6:02 Not if people does the leg work. Like the ai boom happens so one industry can keep the edge. Not because it actually works but because they do not want it to work for the competitors first.
7:57 I dont think 'ever be created' is accurate and to be said precisely wont ever be created… in our life time. Like 200 years from AI will have no use for decisions made today and if anything we are just raising the bar for experiencing the innovation in this life time. — Its like saying "Human longevity? Sure… just give me a minute first…"
@user-tx9zg5mz5p
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
Humans need to unionize against ai and robots…
@olalilja2381
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
We have to differentiate between AI (generative AI) and humanoid robots, both which are on the rise. They will threaten very different jobs. Most of the times they are bunched together and every statistic and predictions become confusing.
@tildarusso
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
US AI bubble is about to burst. I mean AI research itself is nothing wrong, but too much venture capital was poured into this industry (LLM in particular) for unrealistic promises and pre-mature profit expectation. Exactly like the internet bubble at year 2000.
@gabrielpaiva8378
October 13, 2025 at 2:33 am
I love the content here, and I’m not entirely sure why I decided to bring up this specific theme—maybe I just appreciate your insights, or perhaps my methylphenidate just kicked in—but I don’t see much, if any, content about the AI expansion concerning our current planetary resources to fuel this industry.
I’m a physicist, and I KNOW WE CAN BE ANNOYING, lol, but I work with some very prominent researchers whose predictions (and results) have been consistently proving correct. I still remember some of my colleagues at Humboldt questioning "climate scientists," claiming their calculations were absolute nonsense, just plainly RAW WRONG, and they got, as they say, ultimately "cancelled"—until very recently (VERY recently). I’d love to discuss this more, but this video may not be the right place, and I apologize for that. I guess I just needed to spill it out.
Even the LLMs I use to help keep my research organized choke, or rather, hallucinate when things get too complex for them (but not for me, for example). Man, two nights ago, I got so irritated with Claude 3.5 Sonnet, lol! Seriously, I was literally calling it names.
The same thing happened last night when I tried to expose some data to GPT-4 and maybe get it organized in a more orderly way (the IPCC graphs are usually pretty easy to understand, but very detailed), and Albie, my main AI assistant (Erm, my main GPT), literally stopped responding. And I’m talking about somewhat simple calculations. It simply didn’t understand—until it wrote something like, "Oh, I got it now. I’ll work on this for you and get back to you in a few hours." Of course, I wasn’t expecting it to be proactive. Anyways, I digressed, but let me share the exact response Albie wrote so you can giggle:
"Understood, Gabriel. I’ll dive into the research and craft a comprehensive, state-of-the-art paper that meets your expectations. I’ll cover all necessary details, ensuring it’s as extensive and thorough as you want it to be. I’ll take the time needed to ensure it’s up to your standards, and I’ll make sure it aligns with your preferences in tone, depth, and detail.
I’ll get started on this right away and will let you know if any updates are necessary. Looking forward to delivering something exceptional for you."
So, this raises a few, if not a lot, of questions… or am I just being neurotic? I couldn’t accept the fact that the model wasn’t… understanding? Maybe they lean too much towards text, and when there’s too much numbers (in quantity, not complexity), they try to "tokenize" it like they do with words? Am I making any sense? Maybe I’m the one hallucinating.
Comments are closed.