Atheist Slogans You Should Stop Using

Alex, if you ever convert like Joe, will you start to defend the morally objectionable teachings of Christianity? Does power automatically justify a horrible act? Is it necessary for a powerful being to be good, too? If God wants us to abandon our conscience on serious moral issues (not just in nonsensical rituals, or self-discipline), what's the point of giving us conscience then? Why would a good God give a person a conscience and then punish them if they don't choose to abandon their conscience to worship him?

Welcome home Joe!

Here after Joe announces his reversion to Catholicism.

And now Joe is a Catholic

the thing is the multiverse is an actual scientific possibility whereas there's no scientific premise for anything like a "god"

God announced in the Old Testament his name, and that it would endure forever. Many ancient cultures believed their gods spoke to people and would be remembered forever. However, major modern world religions today worship Yahweh (the God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) as the only one of those ancient named deities still actively considered by billions to be a living God today.

2:18:29 Joe is talking about Alfonso Cuaron , he did thin the movie Roma

I am going to make an if statement out of god by my definition. What I am attempting to answer is; "Who created god?".
If god is the underlying principles of everything that was and is to be, then by all definitions god is the word and the word is god as seen in the book of john.
You ask who created the underlying principles of everything, well humans could only ever identify them never create them because principles are the true limitations and expectations of what is to be and what has already happened.

These very principles dictate why there is something rather than nothing. The principle that answers this is that nothing is not as zero is zero which cannot be something not even empty space itself. If there are principles they must interact with something thus what has created everything going forward if not god through the material veil of existence. God was at the beginning of creation itself rather than the beginning of time for as long as there is a measure there is a principle as unbending as god. Those principles that led to something are not a (necessity, will, or chance) but the interaction of creation itself under the principles of god. Who created god? God is a necessity of creation because god is the principle he is the limitations and expectations of all in all things.

These principles that make god true were not created they exist as identifiable traits throughout everything which shape our society and shape us. We are created by those principles which limit us to its expectations and logically we naturally fit ourselves into his mold to fit those principles; else we fail in error. Identifying those principles, as many as there are, help us build and continue to further shape our image into the image of god himself a creator of civilizations society and culture. The laws that dictate ourselves are imperfect the laws of god are unbending. Principles which cannot be broken is the guide and change between ourselves and the world around us.

That is why I believe in god.

1:54:39 – They were in fact not almost done. An hour left on the clock 😂

The argument against claims are not evidence you make: I know this video is old, but it's actually impressive how someone can be so wrong yet so confident. Unbelievable.

You don't believe in unicorns, in vampires, werewolves, I don't believe in one mystical creature extra, I don't believe in giraffes.

Duuuuude that guy on the right is a hotttie 😍 im stright but im lowk swooning 🫣

I'm not sure which would be a bigger miracle. The bagger at Walmart levitating and floating around the store or they're being a bagger at Walmart at all. If I believe there was a bagger at Walmart it would be a small step to believe that he was levitating and floating around the store!

i believe in a perfectly metal god

1:02:33 I would like to point out about this argument that besides the exact religion also (some of) you're moral believes change by location. So even if God were to just look at how you lived your life you might still fail the to meet the moral requirements he puts forth solely because if where you were born

ive got a courgette you can massage

Good thing I don't go around saying atheist slogans(I could be executed by the government🙏)

He's GOD if his tim really is eternal and he really is OMNIPOTENT, he could have personally created every animal ever and made it look like they evolve. Nothing can disprove god but no afterlife.

1:04 as a straight man, is it getting hot in here or is it just me?

1:28:54 People are mixing 3 questions:

1. Are claims a type of evidence at all?
2. Do claims support their own truth?
3. Should we believe claims without additional support?

1. Yes. Claims, as testimony from a source, are a recognized type of evidence. The fact that someone asserts P may provide evidence for P, depending on the reliability of the source.
2. No. A claim is not automatically strong evidence for its own truth. Its evidential weight depends on the speaker’s reliability & the other available evidence.
3. No. A bare assertion, by itself, is usually not sufficient to justify belief.

“Claims aren’t evidence” = shorthand for “A mere assertion is not sufficient evidence to justify belief.”

The problem is that, taken literally, the slogan is technically inaccurate. Testimony is a well-established category of evidence in philosophy, law, history & everyday reasoning.

1. Claims (as testimony) can be evidence.
2. Their evidential weight ranges from negligible to very strong.
3. The proposition P is not evidence for itself. The fact that someone asserts P can be evidence for P, depending on how trustworthy that source is.

The real question isn’t whether claims are evidence. It’s how much evidential weight they deserve.

Seems like these two guys aren't satisfied being smarter than believers so they got to prove they're smarter than atheists too.

I agree that is a dumb slogan. I think it's stuff like that that prevented my from becoming atheist until I finally caved.

Cosmic, you totally lost the logic thread on "one god further". Ricky never meant that as proof against a god, but as an explanation of how an atheist feels towards the claims of the god of Abrahamites. Explaining how unconvincing the argument is.

Yup. My subconscious clearly has a type